Logo

ARBEW

Arbe Robotics Ltd.

ARBEW

Arbe Robotics Ltd. • NASDAQ
$0.19 ▼ -4.81% (-0.01)
Market Cap $21.10 M
52w High $0.25
52w Low $0.18
Dividend Yield 0%
P/E -0.14
Volume 11.14K
Outstanding Shares 111.17M

Income Statement

Period Revenue Operating Expense Net Income Net Profit Margin Earnings Per Share EBITDA
Q3-2025 $254K ▼ $11.268M ▼ $-11.035M ▼ -4.344K% ▼ $-0.098 ▼ $-10.898M ▲
Q2-2025 $274K ▲ $11.295M ▼ $-10.158M ▲ -3.707K% ▲ $-0.09 ▲ $-11.348M ▲
Q1-2025 $40K ▼ $13.063M ▲ $-13.818M ▼ -34.545K% ▼ $-0.13 ▲ $-13.226M ▼
Q4-2024 $99K ▼ $12.626M ▲ $-12.196M ▲ -12.319K% ▼ $-0.15 ▲ $-12.687M ▼
Q3-2024 $123K $12.176M $-12.574M -10.223K% $-0.16 $-12.299M

Balance Statement

Period Cash & Short-term Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Equity
Q3-2025 $61.418M ▲ $66.082M ▼ $16.976M ▼ $49.106M ▼
Q2-2025 $26.039M ▼ $75.835M ▼ $17.85M ▼ $57.985M ▼
Q1-2025 $36.389M ▲ $85.038M ▲ $19.316M ▼ $65.722M ▲
Q4-2024 $24.281M ▲ $60.787M ▲ $38.291M ▲ $22.496M ▲
Q3-2024 $18.808M $55.466M $38.252M $17.214M

Cash Flow Statement

Period Net Income Cash From Operations Cash From Investing Cash From Financing Net Change Free Cash Flow
Q3-2025 $-11.035M ▼ $-11.11M ▲ $8.353M ▼ $0 ▼ $6.221M ▲ $-11.3M ▲
Q2-2025 $-10.158M ▲ $-11.776M ▼ $10.784M ▲ $2K ▼ $-300K ▲ $-11.835M ▼
Q1-2025 $-13.818M ▼ $-6.222M ▲ $-53.205M ▼ $53.385M ▲ $-6.584M ▼ $-6.247M ▲
Q4-2024 $-12.196M ▲ $-8.225M ▼ $-10.862M ▼ $13.787M ▲ $-5.3M ▼ $-8.314M ▼
Q3-2024 $-12.574M $-7.59M $17.355M $183K $9.948M $-7.898M

Five-Year Company Overview

Income Statement

Income Statement Arbe is still essentially a pre‑revenue story, with no meaningful sales showing up yet in the income statement. The company has been running at a steady loss for several years, mainly reflecting ongoing investment in development, engineering, and go‑to‑market efforts rather than any sign of a mature, scaled business. Losses have been relatively stable in size, which suggests management is keeping spending under reasonable control, but there is still no clear evidence in the historical numbers that those costs are beginning to be offset by growing revenue. Overall, the income statement looks like an early‑stage technology company that is still in the build‑out phase rather than one already benefiting from commercial traction.

Balance Sheet

Balance Sheet The balance sheet is small and lean, consistent with a young, focused technology developer. Cash has been trending down over time, which is typical given the ongoing operating losses, and the company has recently begun to use some debt, adding a layer of financial obligation that was not there before. Shareholders’ equity is positive but modest and has been gradually shrinking as losses accumulate. This combination points to a business that still has financial flexibility but will likely remain sensitive to future funding conditions and its ability to convert current projects into paying production programs.

Cash Flow

Cash Flow Cash flow from operations has been consistently negative, reflecting the fact that the company is spending more on salaries, R&D, and overhead than it brings in from customers. The burn rate appears controlled rather than explosive, and there is little in the way of heavy capital spending, which fits an asset‑light, chip‑and‑software model. However, without a turn toward meaningful inflows from customers, the company will remain dependent on its cash reserves and potential external financing. The key unknown is how quickly design wins and planned production ramps can start to ease the ongoing cash drain.

Competitive Edge

Competitive Edge Arbe appears to have carved out a strong technical niche in high‑resolution 4D imaging radar, positioning itself as a differentiated specialist rather than a generic sensor supplier. Its technology offers richer detail and better performance in bad weather than many traditional alternatives, which is attractive for advanced driver assistance and autonomous systems. The company also benefits from partnerships with Tier 1 suppliers, major automakers, and broader platforms like NVIDIA, which help embed its products into larger ecosystems. At the same time, the landscape is highly competitive, with larger, better‑funded players and multiple sensing technologies all vying for a place in future vehicles. Arbe’s competitive strength will ultimately depend on how many of its current trials and partnerships translate into long‑term, high‑volume production programs.

Innovation and R&D

Innovation and R&D Innovation is clearly at the core of Arbe’s identity. The company’s 4D imaging radar, with its very high channel count and dense environmental mapping, is designed to deliver near‑LiDAR levels of detail at radar economics and robustness. Products like its Phoenix and Lynx radar families emphasize all‑weather performance, fine object classification, and compatibility with advanced AI and simulation platforms. Arbe is also looking beyond passenger cars, exploring uses in defense, maritime safety, trucks, smart infrastructure, and robotics, which could broaden its opportunity set if these markets mature. All of this requires sustained R&D spending and careful execution. The main risk is that technical leadership must be continually refreshed and successfully industrialized; otherwise, competing radar or alternative sensing approaches could narrow or erase its edge over time.

Summary

Arbe today looks like a classic early‑stage, high‑tech platform company: strong on innovation and partnerships, weak on current revenues, with a small but gradually eroding financial cushion. The story is less about past financial performance and more about whether its advanced radar technology can secure enough design wins and production contracts to support a durable business. In the near term, the company’s finances reflect steady losses and ongoing cash use, but not at a scale that suggests loss of control. Over the next few years, the key swing factors will be the pace of automotive qualification, the success of planned production ramps with partners, and the company’s ability to diversify into non‑automotive markets. Outcomes span a wide range: if commercialization unfolds as planned, the current financial profile could change meaningfully; if adoption is slower or competition intensifies, pressure on the balance sheet and funding needs would likely increase.