Logo

BLIV

BeLive Holdings

BLIV

BeLive Holdings • NASDAQ
$3.50 ▲ 0.00% (+0.00)
Market Cap $38.03 M
52w High $6.40
52w Low $1.85
Dividend Yield 0%
P/E -3.89
Volume 144
Outstanding Shares 10.86M

Income Statement

Period Revenue Operating Expense Net Income Net Profit Margin Earnings Per Share EBITDA

Balance Statement

Period Cash & Short-term Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Equity
Q4-2024 $66.184K ▲ $834.157K ▼ $970.074K ▲ $-135.917K ▼
Q2-2024 $48.936K ▼ $1.244M ▼ $768.944K ▲ $474.655K ▼
Q4-2023 $197.709K ▼ $1.624M ▼ $507.629K ▼ $1.117M ▼
Q2-2023 $308.594K ▲ $2.473M ▼ $696.462K ▼ $1.777M ▼
Q4-2022 $216.752K $3.612M $734.353K $2.878M

Cash Flow Statement

Period Net Income Cash From Operations Cash From Investing Cash From Financing Net Change Free Cash Flow

Five-Year Company Overview

Income Statement

Income Statement BeLive looks like a very early-stage, effectively pre‑revenue company. The financials show almost no sales yet and small but recurring losses, which is typical for a young software platform still investing ahead of meaningful commercial traction. Earnings per share have swung around over the past few years, which suggests one‑off events such as restructurings, share changes, or accounting adjustments rather than a stable profit pattern. Overall, the income statement tells the story of a business still firmly in the “build and invest” phase rather than one that has proven a repeatable revenue engine.

Balance Sheet

Balance Sheet The balance sheet is extremely light, with very modest assets and no reported debt. That points to a capital‑light software model but also to limited financial cushion. Past data even hint at a period of negative equity, which usually means accumulated losses exceeded initial funding at some point. The absence of meaningful cash on hand in the historical data underlines that BeLive likely relies on external capital injections to fund growth. Financially, this is a lean, fragile balance sheet that needs regular support but is not burdened by leverage.

Cash Flow

Cash Flow Cash flow information is sparse and essentially flat in the past disclosures, which usually means little operating scale and heavy dependence on financing rather than internally generated cash. In practical terms, the business is not yet self‑funding; its ability to keep investing in technology and expansion will depend on how successfully it can raise capital and how carefully it manages its spending. A key watchpoint will be the transition from investment‑driven cash burn toward cash inflows once its products gain traction with paying customers.

Competitive Edge

Competitive Edge Competitively, BeLive is aiming at a promising but crowded space: live commerce and shoppable video. Its edge appears to come from three elements working together: purpose‑built video commerce technology, flexible packaging (white‑label for large enterprises and SaaS for quicker adoption), and meaningful partnerships such as its tie‑up with Tencent Cloud. This combination can be powerful, because it lets the company serve both large and smaller clients while piggybacking on a bigger partner’s infrastructure and reach. The flip side is that big tech platforms and established e‑commerce players are also pursuing live commerce, so BeLive must move fast, differentiate clearly, and continually deepen those partnerships to maintain relevance.

Innovation and R&D

Innovation and R&D Innovation is clearly the core of BeLive’s strategy. The company is leaning heavily on artificial intelligence to enhance every part of the live video journey: analytics to understand audiences, AI assistants to speed content creation, digital avatar hosts to keep viewers engaged, and automatic content moderation to keep streams safe. Its alliance with Tencent Cloud strengthens the technical backbone, supporting high‑quality, low‑latency streaming even in weaker network environments and opening doors to more advanced virtual human and metaverse‑style features. BeLive AI Studios adds a creative layer on top of the tech, helping brands actually produce compelling content rather than just providing tools. The exploration of digital asset strategies and Web3 payments is more experimental and higher risk, but it illustrates a willingness to push into new models. The key question over time will be how well these innovations translate into stable, paying client relationships.

Summary

BeLive looks like a classic early‑stage technology story: financially small, pre‑revenue, and loss‑making, but aiming at a fast‑growing niche with a technology‑heavy approach. The company’s fundamentals show minimal scale and a thin balance sheet, so execution and continued access to capital are critical. On the strategic side, its focus on AI‑driven live commerce, strong cloud partnership, flexible delivery models, and in‑house creative studio give it a differentiated proposition in an emerging market. The long‑term outcome will depend on two things: how effectively it can turn this innovation and partnership network into recurring, commercial revenue, and how prudently it manages risk while exploring newer areas like digital assets and Web3 payments.