Logo

CDTG

CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares

CDTG

CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited ordinary shares NASDAQ
$0.39 -1.69% (-0.01)

Market Cap $4.81 M
52w High $4.64
52w Low $0.25
Dividend Yield 0%
P/E 2.79
Volume 200
Outstanding Shares 12.32M

Income Statement

Period Revenue Operating Expense Net Income Net Profit Margin Earnings Per Share EBITDA
Q4-2024 $2.379M $916.149K $-2.206K -0.093% $-0 $118.642K
Q2-2024 $12.687M $2.672M $1.469M 11.579% $0.15 $2.001M
Q4-2023 $18.746M $295.804K $5.384M 28.719% $0.59 $6.31M
Q2-2023 $2.231M $357.461K $293.459K 13.153% $0.027 $379.818K
Q4-2022 $2.289M $-500.088 $707.339K 30.904% $0.066 $850.111K

Balance Statement

Period Cash & Short-term Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Equity
Q4-2024 $124.379K $89.361M $51.923M $37.284M
Q2-2024 $96.324K $79.262M $41.762M $37.354M
Q4-2023 $268.102K $72.792M $40.705M $31.903M
Q2-2023 $67.657K $7.732M $4.104M $3.582M
Q4-2022 $28.75K $7.755M $4.078M $3.597M

Cash Flow Statement

Period Net Income Cash From Operations Cash From Investing Cash From Financing Net Change Free Cash Flow
Q4-2024 $-15.837K $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Q2-2024 $1.469M $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Q4-2023 $5.384M $-241.621K $51.537K $160.181K $-29.855K $-1.646M
Q2-2023 $2.034M $-1.325M $-123.947K $1.753M $491.464K $-1.508M
Q4-2022 $707.339K $-335.503K $-1.735K $315.055K $-22.183K $-336.162K

Five-Year Company Overview

Income Statement

Income Statement Revenue has been slowly increasing over the past few years but still sits at a very small scale, which means the business is still in an early stage from a revenue standpoint. Profitability has improved from roughly breakeven to modest profits, though results have been somewhat jumpy from year to year, suggesting earnings are still sensitive to individual projects and contracts. The pattern looks more like a developing project and technology company than a mature, stable utility: moving in the right direction, but off a low base and with noticeable volatility.


Balance Sheet

Balance Sheet The balance sheet has expanded, with both total assets and shareholders’ equity rising over time, which is consistent with a company building out its operations and project base. Debt remains present but appears limited relative to equity, which points to a capital structure that is not overly aggressive at this stage. However, the company is still quite small in absolute size, which means it likely has less of a financial cushion than larger players if projects are delayed or markets weaken. The lack of clear cash balance detail also makes it harder to judge short‑term liquidity strength from this data alone.


Cash Flow

Cash Flow Reported operating cash flow and free cash flow are essentially not visible in the summary data provided, which raises two possibilities: either the information is incomplete, or cash generation has been minimal so far. For a project‑driven business like this, cash flows can lag reported profits because of construction cycles, payment terms with customers, and upfront costs for new projects and technologies. Without clearer cash flow detail, it is hard to assess how well profits are converting into cash, how self‑funded growth really is, and how dependent the company may be on external financing over time. This is an area of uncertainty and a key risk to monitor for a young, expanding company.


Competitive Edge

Competitive Edge CDTG operates in a structurally attractive niche: waste treatment and environmental services in China, with experience delivering a large number of plants across multiple regions. Its main competitive strengths appear to be a portfolio of protected technologies, an end‑to‑end service model covering design through long‑term operations, and experience serving both rural and urban sewage needs. The company’s focus on integrated, automated systems and its ability to offer mobile and fixed solutions gives it some flexibility to tailor offerings to local governments and industrial clients. At the same time, the waste and environmental sector in China is competitive, with many regional and national players, and contract awards often depend on price, relationships, and local policy support. CDTG’s relatively small scale means it must continue to rely on its technical edge, references from completed projects, and partnerships to defend and grow its position.


Innovation and R&D

Innovation and R&D Innovation is clearly at the center of CDTG’s strategy. The company has built a sizable portfolio of patents covering sludge drying, wastewater treatment, anaerobic fermentation, and other specialized processes, indicating sustained investment in engineering and process design. It is also pushing into AI‑enabled waste sorting and “quick separation” processes, which, if executed well, can improve efficiency and lower operating costs for clients. The most ambitious step is its move into waste‑to‑hydrogen and broader waste‑to‑energy solutions, supported by collaborations with leading research institutions. This gives CDTG a potential path into the higher‑growth clean energy space, but it also adds execution risk: scaling new technologies, securing long‑term supply contracts, and financing larger projects can all be challenging for a relatively small company. Overall, the innovation story is a major strength, but its commercial payoff is still in the proving phase.


Summary

CDTG looks like an early‑stage environmental technology and project company that has begun to establish itself in China’s waste treatment market while reaching for a bigger role in green energy. Financially, it has moved from very low revenue and near‑breakeven results toward modest profitability, with a balance sheet that is growing but still small in scale and not obviously over‑leveraged based on the limited data. The main attractions are its patent‑backed technologies, integrated service model, and the strategic push into waste‑to‑hydrogen and AI‑driven waste management, all aligned with long‑term environmental and clean‑energy themes. The main risks are its small size, uneven earnings history, limited visibility on cash generation, project execution risk, and dependence on policy and contract awards in a competitive domestic market. How well CDTG converts its technical strengths and partnerships into steady, cash‑generating projects over the next several years will likely determine whether it can mature from a niche innovator into a more stable environmental infrastructure player.