CLSD - Clearside Biomedica... Stock Analysis | Stock Taper
Logo
Clearside Biomedical, Inc.

CLSD

Clearside Biomedical, Inc. NASDAQ
$0.41 -45.33% (-0.34)

Market Cap $2.15 M
52w High $17.10
52w Low $0.31
P/E -0.08
Volume 2.05M
Outstanding Shares 5.23M

Income Statement

Period Revenue Operating Expense Net Income Net Profit Margin Earnings Per Share EBITDA
Q3-2025 $201K $7.24M $-5.97M -2.97K% $-1.14 $-3.32M
Q2-2025 $492K $3.98M $-4.5M -913.62% $-0.87 $-1.65M
Q1-2025 $2.33M $7.29M $-8.22M -352.92% $-1.65 $-4.75M
Q4-2024 $306K $7.31M $-7.31M -2.39K% $-1.44 $-4.65M
Q3-2024 $1.04M $6.97M $-7.69M -740.66% $-1.5 $-5.16M

What's going well?

The company had a boost from other income this quarter, and there are no one-time charges muddying the results. The share count is stable, so existing shareholders aren't being diluted.

What's concerning?

Revenue plunged while expenses nearly doubled, leading to much bigger losses. Interest costs are high, and the company is burning far more cash than it brings in – this is not sustainable.

Balance Statement

Period Cash & Short-term Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Equity
Q3-2025 $6.8M $11.64M $65.59M $-53.95M
Q2-2025 $9.38M $15.33M $64.07M $-48.73M
Q1-2025 $13.63M $19.67M $65.58M $-45.91M
Q4-2024 $20.02M $25.13M $63.98M $-38.85M
Q3-2024 $23.59M $29.16M $63.95M $-34.79M

What's financially strong about this company?

They still have $6.8 million in cash and little debt. Most assets are liquid, and there is no risky goodwill or intangibles.

What are the financial risks or weaknesses?

The company has negative equity of $53.9 million, is losing money, and cash is running out fast. Without new funding, survival is at risk.

Cash Flow Statement

Period Net Income Cash From Operations Cash From Investing Cash From Financing Net Change Free Cash Flow
Q3-2025 $-5.97M $-5.48M $0 $2.9M $-2.58M $-5.48M
Q2-2025 $-4.5M $-4.73M $0 $477K $-4.25M $-4.73M
Q1-2025 $-8.22M $-5.83M $-9K $-553K $-6.39M $-5.83M
Q4-2024 $-7.31M $-5.25M $9.31M $2.08M $6.13M $-5.7M
Q3-2024 $-7.69M $-5.91M $1.55M $14K $-4.35M $-5.97M

What's strong about this company's cash flow?

The company has kept capital spending at zero, so cash burn is not from big investments. Working capital changes helped cash flow this quarter.

What are the cash flow concerns?

Cash burn is rising, and the company is highly dependent on outside funding. With only $6.8 million left, it will need to raise more money soon.

Revenue by Products

Product Q1-2019Q2-2019Q3-2019Q2-2020
License And Service
License And Service
$0 $0 $0 $0

Q4 2024 Earnings Call Summary

Read Call Summary

5-Year Trend Analysis

A comprehensive look at Clearside Biomedical, Inc.'s financial evolution and strategic trajectory over the past five years.

+ Strengths

Key positives include a genuinely novel and validated ocular drug delivery platform, the successful approval of XIPERE as proof of concept, and a pipeline that addresses large markets like wet age‑related macular degeneration and geographic atrophy. High gross margins when revenue is present suggest attractive unit economics if the technology scales. The company has also demonstrated an ability to attract partners and external funding, and it has maintained a strong internal R&D capability focused on retina and ocular drug delivery.

! Risks

Major risks center on financial fragility and execution. Revenue has collapsed after a one‑time spike and has not recovered, while operating and net losses have grown larger. The balance sheet has deteriorated to the point of negative equity and higher leverage, and liquidity has weakened. Cash burn remains substantial, forcing heavy reliance on new financing and ultimately leading to a Chapter 11 filing and a search for strategic alternatives. On top of this, Clearside faces intense competition from well‑capitalized players, high clinical and regulatory risk in its pipeline, and dependence on partners for commercialization and further development.

Outlook

The forward view for Clearside as a corporate entity is highly uncertain and now primarily shaped by restructuring and strategic transactions rather than organic growth prospects. The underlying technology and pipeline assets appear to hold meaningful scientific and commercial potential, but the current business has not yet shown a path to self‑sustaining operations. Future outcomes are likely to involve asset sales, partnerships, or acquisition, with the suprachoroidal platform continuing in some form even if the existing corporate structure changes. Overall, the situation combines strong scientific promise with very elevated financial and operational risk, and the eventual balance between those two forces will depend heavily on how the Chapter 11 and strategic review processes unfold.