DRDB
DRDB
Roman DBDR Acquisition Corp. IIIncome Statement
| Period | Revenue | Operating Expense | Net Income | Net Profit Margin | Earnings Per Share | EBITDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2025 | $0 | $1M ▲ | $1.36M ▼ | 0% | $0.04 ▼ | $-3.43M ▼ |
| Q3-2025 | $0 | $513.3K ▲ | $2.14M ▲ | 0% | $0.07 ▲ | $-513.3K ▼ |
| Q2-2025 | $0 | $394.73K ▲ | $2.03M ▼ | 0% | $0.07 ▼ | $2.03M ▲ |
| Q1-2025 | $0 | $341.38K ▲ | $2.21M ▲ | 0% | $0.07 ▲ | $-341K ▼ |
| Q4-2024 | $0 | $116.19K | $314.2K | 0% | $0.01 | $314.2K |
Balance Statement
| Period | Cash & Short-term | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Total Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2025 | $183.02K ▼ | $241.51M ▲ | $1.1M ▲ | $240.41M ▲ |
| Q3-2025 | $323.68K ▼ | $239.33M ▲ | $275.57K ▲ | $239.05M ▲ |
| Q2-2025 | $618.82K ▼ | $237.01M ▲ | $98.52K ▲ | $236.91M ▲ |
| Q1-2025 | $948.5K ▼ | $234.96M ▲ | $75.03K ▼ | $234.89M ▲ |
| Q4-2024 | $1.27M | $202.81M | $301.81K | $202.51M |
Cash Flow Statement
| Period | Net Income | Cash From Operations | Cash From Investing | Cash From Financing | Net Change | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2025 | $1.36M ▼ | $-340.66K ▼ | $0 ▲ | $200K ▼ | $-140.66K ▲ | $-340.66K ▼ |
| Q1-2025 | $2.21M ▲ | $-323.43K ▲ | $-30.15M ▲ | $30.15M ▼ | $-323.43K ▼ | $-323.43K ▲ |
| Q4-2024 | $314.2K ▲ | $-411.8K ▼ | $-201M ▼ | $202.68M ▲ | $1.27M ▲ | $-411.8K ▼ |
| Q3-2024 | $-90.74K | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
5-Year Trend Analysis
A comprehensive look at Roman DBDR Acquisition Corp. II's financial evolution and strategic trajectory over the past five years.
DRDB’s current strengths are structural rather than operational: it holds significant investment assets, carries no debt, and has enough cash and financing access to function as a SPAC. The planned merger with ThomasLloyd introduces additional positives, including a long operating history in sustainable infrastructure, a vertically integrated model spanning development to operations, and a clear strategic focus on high-growth areas like renewable power for data centers. Together, these elements create a credible foundation for a future operating business once the merger is completed.
Key risks center on the absence of a current operating business, negative operating and free cash flow, and reliance on non-operating items and financing flows to support reported earnings and cash levels. The negative equity position is a structural warning sign, even if partly explained by the SPAC model. Looking ahead, there is meaningful transaction risk around closing and integrating the ThomasLloyd deal, as well as ongoing exposure to project execution risk, regulatory and policy shifts, competition from large, well-capitalized players, and the capital-intensive nature of sustainable infrastructure.
In the near term, DRDB’s outlook is dominated by deal milestones rather than business performance: preserving its capital base and successfully closing the ThomasLloyd merger are the critical steps. Over the medium to long term, the picture becomes much more operational and uncertain, hinging on ThomasLloyd’s ability to win and execute profitable projects, particularly in the U.S. data center and broader sustainable infrastructure markets. Outcomes could range widely—from a scaled, cash-generative platform to a more modest or challenged business—so ongoing monitoring of project wins, conversion of accounting profits to cash, and capital discipline will be essential to understanding how the story actually evolves.
About Roman DBDR Acquisition Corp. II
https://www.romandbdr.comRoman DBDR Acquisition Corp. II operates as a blank check company. It was incorporated for the purpose of effecting a merger, amalgamation, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses. The company was founded on July 25, 2024 and is headquartered in Boca Raton, FL.
Income Statement
| Period | Revenue | Operating Expense | Net Income | Net Profit Margin | Earnings Per Share | EBITDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2025 | $0 | $1M ▲ | $1.36M ▼ | 0% | $0.04 ▼ | $-3.43M ▼ |
| Q3-2025 | $0 | $513.3K ▲ | $2.14M ▲ | 0% | $0.07 ▲ | $-513.3K ▼ |
| Q2-2025 | $0 | $394.73K ▲ | $2.03M ▼ | 0% | $0.07 ▼ | $2.03M ▲ |
| Q1-2025 | $0 | $341.38K ▲ | $2.21M ▲ | 0% | $0.07 ▲ | $-341K ▼ |
| Q4-2024 | $0 | $116.19K | $314.2K | 0% | $0.01 | $314.2K |
Balance Statement
| Period | Cash & Short-term | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Total Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2025 | $183.02K ▼ | $241.51M ▲ | $1.1M ▲ | $240.41M ▲ |
| Q3-2025 | $323.68K ▼ | $239.33M ▲ | $275.57K ▲ | $239.05M ▲ |
| Q2-2025 | $618.82K ▼ | $237.01M ▲ | $98.52K ▲ | $236.91M ▲ |
| Q1-2025 | $948.5K ▼ | $234.96M ▲ | $75.03K ▼ | $234.89M ▲ |
| Q4-2024 | $1.27M | $202.81M | $301.81K | $202.51M |
Cash Flow Statement
| Period | Net Income | Cash From Operations | Cash From Investing | Cash From Financing | Net Change | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2025 | $1.36M ▼ | $-340.66K ▼ | $0 ▲ | $200K ▼ | $-140.66K ▲ | $-340.66K ▼ |
| Q1-2025 | $2.21M ▲ | $-323.43K ▲ | $-30.15M ▲ | $30.15M ▼ | $-323.43K ▼ | $-323.43K ▲ |
| Q4-2024 | $314.2K ▲ | $-411.8K ▼ | $-201M ▼ | $202.68M ▲ | $1.27M ▲ | $-411.8K ▼ |
| Q3-2024 | $-90.74K | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
5-Year Trend Analysis
A comprehensive look at Roman DBDR Acquisition Corp. II's financial evolution and strategic trajectory over the past five years.
DRDB’s current strengths are structural rather than operational: it holds significant investment assets, carries no debt, and has enough cash and financing access to function as a SPAC. The planned merger with ThomasLloyd introduces additional positives, including a long operating history in sustainable infrastructure, a vertically integrated model spanning development to operations, and a clear strategic focus on high-growth areas like renewable power for data centers. Together, these elements create a credible foundation for a future operating business once the merger is completed.
Key risks center on the absence of a current operating business, negative operating and free cash flow, and reliance on non-operating items and financing flows to support reported earnings and cash levels. The negative equity position is a structural warning sign, even if partly explained by the SPAC model. Looking ahead, there is meaningful transaction risk around closing and integrating the ThomasLloyd deal, as well as ongoing exposure to project execution risk, regulatory and policy shifts, competition from large, well-capitalized players, and the capital-intensive nature of sustainable infrastructure.
In the near term, DRDB’s outlook is dominated by deal milestones rather than business performance: preserving its capital base and successfully closing the ThomasLloyd merger are the critical steps. Over the medium to long term, the picture becomes much more operational and uncertain, hinging on ThomasLloyd’s ability to win and execute profitable projects, particularly in the U.S. data center and broader sustainable infrastructure markets. Outcomes could range widely—from a scaled, cash-generative platform to a more modest or challenged business—so ongoing monitoring of project wins, conversion of accounting profits to cash, and capital discipline will be essential to understanding how the story actually evolves.

CEO
Dixon R. Doll Jr.
Compensation Summary
(Year )
ETFs Holding This Stock
Summary
Showing Top 1 of 1
Ratings Snapshot
Rating : B-
Price Target
Institutional Ownership
METEORA CAPITAL, LLC
Shares:2.24M
Value:$23.49M
FORT BAKER CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP
Shares:1.52M
Value:$16.01M
ARISTEIA CAPITAL LLC
Shares:1.23M
Value:$12.97M
Summary
Showing Top 3 of 54

