Logo

EMP

Entergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66

EMP

Entergy Mississippi, Inc. 1M BD 66 NYSE
$21.14 -0.33% (-0.07)

Market Cap $183.21 M
52w High $21.28
52w Low $7.63
Dividend Yield 1.23%
P/E 1.6
Volume 17.59K
Outstanding Shares 8.67M

Income Statement

Period Revenue Operating Expense Net Income Net Profit Margin Earnings Per Share EBITDA
Q3-2025 $3.812B $1.652B $693.8M 18.2% $1.55 $1.776B
Q2-2025 $3.329B $1.391B $467.93M 14.057% $1.07 $202.521M
Q1-2025 $2.847B $1.128B $360.76M 12.672% $0.84 $1.324B
Q4-2024 $453.421M $4.639B $299.618M 66.079% $-1.06 $189.551M
Q3-2024 $3.389B $643.017M $644.94M 19.03% $3.01 $1.668B

Balance Statement

Period Cash & Short-term Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Equity
Q3-2025 $0 $0 $94.652M $16.662B
Q2-2025 $401.366M $492.13M $49.023M $443.107M
Q1-2025 $598.157M $483.113M $51.801M $2.513B
Q4-2024 $155.693M $6.989B $101.076M $15.084B
Q3-2024 $155.693M $6.989B $108.869M $15.033B

Cash Flow Statement

Period Net Income Cash From Operations Cash From Investing Cash From Financing Net Change Free Cash Flow
Q3-2025 $-129.506M $-231.878M $554.115M $-284.293M $-284.943M $-352.611M
Q2-2025 $-68.871M $166.908M $-359.384M $-4.315M $-353.617M $-477.556M
Q1-2025 $12.099M $2.589M $-21.851M $1.411M $-17.851M $-217.605M
Q4-2024 $83.578M $459.569M $-359.441M $-291.093M $-168.646M $451.178M
Q3-2024 $99.012M $178.776M $-195.537M $14.752M $343.327M $501.208M

Revenue by Products

Product Q3-2024Q1-2025Q2-2025Q3-2025
Electricity US Regulated
Electricity US Regulated
$3.34Bn $2.76Bn $3.27Bn $3.80Bn
Natural Gas US Regulated
Natural Gas US Regulated
$30.00M $70.00M $40.00M $0
Product and Service Other
Product and Service Other
$20.00M $20.00M $10.00M $10.00M

Five-Year Company Overview

Income Statement

Income Statement Entergy Mississippi’s income statement shows a business that has grown from a stable base into a much larger operation in the most recent year. Revenue and profits had been rising gradually for several years, then jumped sharply in the latest period, suggesting a major step‑up in activity, new large customers, or a change in how results are reported. Profitability looks solid for a regulated utility, with operating and EBITDA performance improving as the company scales. Net income has grown along with operating profit, indicating that financing costs and other below‑the‑line items are not eroding earnings. The one concern is that such a big leap in the latest year may not be fully recurring, so understanding what drove it is important when thinking about future stability.


Balance Sheet

Balance Sheet The balance sheet reflects a capital‑intensive utility steadily building out its asset base. Total assets have grown consistently as the company invests in plants, grid infrastructure, and technology upgrades. Debt has also climbed, which is typical in this sector, but the recent strengthening of equity suggests the parent has significantly reinforced the company’s capital cushion, improving leverage on paper. Cash balances remain modest, which is common for regulated utilities that rely on ongoing cash inflows and access to funding rather than large cash hoards. The main watch point is how future debt levels evolve relative to earnings and regulatory support, given the scale of planned investments.


Cash Flow

Cash Flow Cash flow tells the story of heavy investment. Operating cash flow has grown over time and now comfortably covers day‑to‑day operations, reflecting healthier underlying earnings. Free cash flow had been negative for several years as the company poured money into new projects, but it has recently moved close to break‑even, suggesting the most intense phase of spending may be easing or that earnings are catching up. Capital expenditure remains substantial, consistent with grid modernization and new generation assets. Overall, the profile is typical of a growing regulated utility: strong operating cash, tight free cash because of ongoing projects, and reliance on external financing to bridge the gap.


Competitive Edge

Competitive Edge Entergy Mississippi operates in a classic regulated utility environment where its service territory, scale, and infrastructure create high barriers to entry. As the dominant electric provider in its region, with a long‑standing customer base and deep regulatory relationships, it enjoys a relatively stable demand profile. Its economic development strategy—helping attract large industrial clients such as data centers—adds an extra layer of advantage by growing load and spreading fixed costs over more usage. Tailored programs for businesses and community support initiatives help cement relationships with regulators, local governments, and customers. Key risks to its position lie in regulatory shifts, public pressure on rates, and the need to maintain high reliability in the face of severe weather and changing energy policies.


Innovation and R&D

Innovation and R&D Innovation at Entergy Mississippi is focused on modernizing the grid and transitioning the power mix rather than traditional lab‑style R&D. The “Superpower Mississippi” program brings advanced meters, automated switches, and modern control systems that should cut outages and improve efficiency. The EDGE initiative and projects like the Sunflower Solar Station and the Delta Blues Advanced Power Station show a pragmatic approach to cleaner, more flexible generation. The company is also exploring forward‑looking options such as small modular nuclear reactors and hydrogen‑ready gas plants, which could be important long‑term differentiators if they prove viable. Execution and regulatory approval remain the main uncertainties: the benefits of these technologies depend on delivering projects on time, on budget, and in a way that regulators are willing to support in customer rates.


Summary

Overall, Entergy Mississippi appears to be a regulated utility in the midst of a major build‑out and modernization phase, with financials that have shifted from steady growth to a much larger scale in the latest year. The company combines improving profitability with a heavy, but typical, investment burden for its sector, supported by a stronger equity base and growing operating cash flow. Its competitive strengths lie in its entrenched regional position, supportive regulatory framework, and an active role in attracting large customers that help fund grid upgrades. On the opportunity side, smart grid deployment, renewable expansion, and potential next‑generation nuclear or hydrogen projects could enhance efficiency and long‑term growth. On the risk side, substantial capital needs, exposure to regulatory decisions, weather‑related reliability challenges, and the possibility that recent growth includes one‑off elements all introduce uncertainty that observers should keep in mind when assessing the company’s future trajectory.