Logo

FCHL

Fitness Champs Holdings Limited Common Stock

FCHL

Fitness Champs Holdings Limited Common Stock NASDAQ
$0.36 4.18% (+0.01)

Market Cap $5.47 M
52w High $7.64
52w Low $0.33
Dividend Yield 0%
P/E 36.38
Volume 74.22K
Outstanding Shares 15.04M

Income Statement

Period Revenue Operating Expense Net Income Net Profit Margin Earnings Per Share EBITDA

Balance Statement

Period Cash & Short-term Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Equity
Q4-2024 $314K $2.364M $2.349M $15K
Q2-2024 $440K $1.842M $1.816M $26K

Cash Flow Statement

Period Net Income Cash From Operations Cash From Investing Cash From Financing Net Change Free Cash Flow

Five-Year Company Overview

Income Statement

Income Statement The income statement data provided is essentially empty, showing no revenue, no gross profit, and no operating or net income for the past few years, yet it does show small positive earnings per share. That combination looks more like placeholder or incomplete data than a real operating history. In practical terms, there is no usable record here of how the business actually makes money, how fast it is growing, or whether it has been profitable in any meaningful way. Any view of profitability or growth is therefore highly uncertain and should be treated as unknown rather than positive or negative.


Balance Sheet

Balance Sheet The balance sheet figures are all shown as zero for assets, cash, debt, and equity. That is not realistic for a functioning company and signals that detailed balance sheet information is missing rather than that the company has no assets or liabilities. Without a real balance sheet, it is impossible to judge financial strength, debt burden, or balance sheet flexibility. Key questions like how much cash cushion it has, how dependent it is on borrowing, or how much capital has been invested in the business remain unanswered.


Cash Flow

Cash Flow The cash flow section is also fully blank, with no operating cash flow, no capital spending, and no free cash flow reported. This means there is no visibility into whether the business model converts earnings into cash, how much it spends to grow or maintain operations, or how self‑funded it is versus needing outside capital. For a young or newly listed company, cash flow quality and runway are critical, but here they are entirely opaque based on the data provided.


Competitive Edge

Competitive Edge The company is labeled in the consumer defensive sector under education and training services, likely linked to fitness or wellness education. However, there is no concrete information on its scale, brand strength, customer base, pricing power, or geographic reach. The fitness and education space tends to be crowded, with many local and digital competitors, so competitive position usually hinges on differentiation, content quality, and community building. With no disclosed details, its standing versus rivals, its ability to retain customers, and its resilience through economic cycles are all unknown.


Innovation and R&D

Innovation and R&D A search for this specific company and ticker reportedly did not produce reliable public information, which suggests it may be very new, very small, or operating under a different name. There is no clear evidence of distinctive technology, proprietary content, or unique delivery models from the data supplied. As a result, it is not possible to judge whether the company has any meaningful innovation edge or moat, or whether it is essentially a standard fitness‑education business competing mostly on price and marketing.


Summary

Overall, the available information on Fitness Champs Holdings is extremely limited and appears incomplete. The financial statements do not show a real operating history, the balance sheet and cash flows are blank, and external research has not surfaced clear details on its business model, scale, or differentiation. This places the company firmly in the “information‑poor” category, where the main feature is uncertainty. Key risks include the absence of transparent financials, unclear competitive positioning, and no visible evidence of a durable innovation advantage. Anyone evaluating this name would need to treat the current data set as a starting point only and seek primary sources such as official filings and company communications before drawing any firm conclusions about its quality or prospects.