GTBP - GT Biopharma, Inc. Stock Analysis | Stock Taper
Logo
GT Biopharma, Inc.

GTBP

GT Biopharma, Inc. NASDAQ
$0.48 1.92% (+0.01)

Market Cap $5.08 M
52w High $3.85
52w Low $0.40
P/E -0.14
Volume 596.79K
Outstanding Shares 10.62M

Income Statement

Period Revenue Operating Expense Net Income Net Profit Margin Earnings Per Share EBITDA
Q3-2025 $0 $3.38M $-3.11M 0% $-0.83 $-3.11M
Q2-2025 $0 $1.51M $-1.43M 0% $-0.55 $-1.43M
Q1-2025 $0 $1.93M $-776K 0% $-0.33 $-776K
Q4-2024 $0 $3.76M $-3.77M 0% $-1.99 $-3.77M
Q3-2024 $0 $3.6M $-3.41M 0% $-1.53 $-3.41M

What's going well?

The company is still investing in research and development, and other income increased this quarter. No interest or tax burden helps keep costs down.

What's concerning?

There is still no revenue, losses are growing quickly, expenses have more than doubled, and shareholders are being diluted. The company is burning through cash with no clear path to sales or profitability.

Balance Statement

Period Cash & Short-term Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Equity
Q3-2025 $2.62M $4.32M $1.32M $3M
Q2-2025 $5.23M $7.12M $2.31M $4.82M
Q1-2025 $2.37M $2.66M $3.64M $-980K
Q4-2024 $3.95M $4.23M $5.9M $-1.67M
Q3-2024 $6.42M $6.76M $4.66M $2.1M

What's financially strong about this company?

No debt at all, so there is no risk from loans or interest payments. All assets are tangible and liquid, mostly cash, and there are no hidden obligations.

What are the financial risks or weaknesses?

Cash is running down quickly, and the company has a long history of losses. Equity is shrinking, and they may need to raise more money soon just to keep operating.

Cash Flow Statement

Period Net Income Cash From Operations Cash From Investing Cash From Financing Net Change Free Cash Flow
Q3-2025 $-3.11M $-3.68M $0 $977K $-2.7M $-3.68M
Q2-2025 $-1.43M $-3.01M $0 $5.88M $2.86M $-3.01M
Q1-2025 $-776K $-2.2M $0 $616K $-1.59M $-2.2M
Q4-2024 $-3.77M $-2.47M $1K $0 $-2.47M $-2.47M
Q3-2024 $-3.41M $-2.74M $-1K $0 $-2.74M $-2.74M

What's strong about this company's cash flow?

The company can still raise cash by issuing new shares, and has no debt burden. No capital spending means low fixed costs.

What are the cash flow concerns?

Cash burn is rising, cash on hand is running out, and the business depends on selling more stock to survive. Dividends are not sustainable.

Q2 2021 Earnings Call Summary

Read Call Summary

5-Year Trend Analysis

A comprehensive look at GT Biopharma, Inc.'s financial evolution and strategic trajectory over the past five years.

+ Strengths

Key strengths include a clearly differentiated immuno-oncology platform, a pipeline that addresses both hematologic and solid tumors, and a simplified balance sheet with no financial debt. Management has demonstrated the ability to cut overhead meaningfully, focusing resources on core R&D, and has historically been able to raise capital when needed. The TriKE concept—off-the-shelf NK-cell engagement with built-in IL-15 stimulation and nanobody engineering—offers a compelling scientific rationale that could appeal to partners and clinicians if trial data continue to support it.

! Risks

Major risks center on funding, solvency, and clinical execution. The company has no revenue, continues to post sizeable operating and cash losses, and now shows negative equity and weaker liquidity metrics, all of which underline dependence on fresh capital. Reverse splits, Nasdaq compliance issues, and past dilution highlight market and listing risk. Scientifically, GT Biopharma competes against well-funded peers with similar or overlapping technologies, and any disappointing trial results, delays, or safety concerns could quickly reduce its strategic options.

Outlook

The outlook is inherently high-risk and highly dependent on a few key inflection points: near-term financing and listing outcomes, and medium-term clinical readouts from the leading TriKE programs around the middle of the decade. If the company can secure adequate funding, maintain its listing, and produce strong safety and efficacy data, it could transition from a financially constrained R&D story into a more credible partner or eventual commercial player. If not, persistent cash burn, balance sheet weakness, and intense competition could significantly limit its ability to realize the scientific promise of its platform.