Logo

HVIIR

Hennessy Capital Investment Corp. VII

HVIIR

Hennessy Capital Investment Corp. VII • NASDAQ
$0.33 ▲ 10.00% (+0.03)
Market Cap $6.50 M
52w High $0.33
52w Low $0.32
Dividend Yield 0%
P/E 0
Volume 1.45K
Outstanding Shares 19.69M

Income Statement

Period Revenue Operating Expense Net Income Net Profit Margin Earnings Per Share EBITDA
Q3-2025 $0 $819.219K ▲ $1.192M ▼ 0% $0.05 ▼ $0 ▲
Q2-2025 $0 $448.91K ▼ $1.521M ▲ 0% $0.058 ▲ $-448.91K ▼
Q1-2025 $0 $489.035K ▲ $1.018M ▲ 0% $0.05 ▲ $1.018M ▲
Q4-2024 $0 $47.952K ▲ $-47.952K ▼ 0% $-0.002 ▼ $-47.952K ▼
Q3-2024 $0 $15.301K $-15.301K 0% $-0.001 $-15.301K

Balance Statement

Period Cash & Short-term Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Equity
Q3-2025 $1.623M ▼ $196.905M ▲ $8.955M ▲ $-7.256M ▼
Q2-2025 $1.861M ▼ $195.29M ▲ $8.532M ▲ $186.759M ▲
Q1-2025 $2.044M ▲ $193.709M ▲ $8.47M ▲ $185.238M ▲
Q3-2024 $25K $86.56K $76.861K $9.699K

Cash Flow Statement

Period Net Income Cash From Operations Cash From Investing Cash From Financing Net Change Free Cash Flow
Q3-2025 $2.76M ▲ $-625.603K ▼ $239.525K ▲ $-55.42K ▼ $-421.493K ▼ $-625.603K ▼
Q1-2025 $1.018M ▲ $-488.511K ▼ $-190M ▼ $192.513M ▲ $2.024M ▲ $-488.511K ▼
Q4-2024 $-47.952K $-35.415K $0 $55.42K $20.005K $-35.415K

Five-Year Company Overview

Income Statement

Income Statement HVIIR is essentially a shell company today, so its income statement is a blank slate. It has no meaningful revenue, no ongoing operations, and no real profitability profile yet. The financial story will only start to take shape if and when the merger with ONE Nuclear Energy closes and the new business actually begins building and operating its energy parks. Until then, historical earnings tell you almost nothing about the future business; the main thing to focus on is the business plan and execution risks rather than past financial performance.

Balance Sheet

Balance Sheet The current balance sheet reflects a SPAC structure: mostly cash raised from investors and no operating assets, plants, or sizeable debt tied to a running business. That means there is little traditional financial risk today, but also no underlying operating base. After a merger, the balance sheet would likely transform quickly, with heavy investment in energy infrastructure, long-lived assets, and potentially new financing. The strength of the future balance sheet will depend on how much capital is raised, the cost of that capital, and how carefully big projects are phased and managed over time.

Cash Flow

Cash Flow Right now, cash flows are minimal and largely administrative, since there is no operating business. The key cash-flow question is entirely forward-looking: can the combined company move from a cash-consuming development phase—permitting, engineering, construction—to a cash-generating phase from long-term power sales. The hybrid model (gas first, nuclear later) is intended to bring in earlier cash flow from natural gas plants while the more complex nuclear projects work through design and regulatory hurdles. Actual outcomes will hinge on construction timelines, cost discipline, and the quality and duration of customer contracts.

Competitive Edge

Competitive Edge The planned combined company is aiming for a strong niche serving large, power-hungry customers like data centers, with a promise of reliable, low-carbon, always-on power. Its edge is expected to come from several angles: a develop-own-operate model that keeps control of assets; careful site selection near key infrastructure; and partnerships with major names in engineering, equipment, and project management. At the same time, this is a fiercely competitive and heavily regulated space, with big traditional utilities, renewable developers, and other advanced nuclear players also chasing the same demand. Execution, permitting, and the pace of data center growth will be critical in determining whether the envisioned moat actually materializes.

Innovation and R&D

Innovation and R&D Innovation here is less about lab research and more about combining existing and emerging technologies into a new business model. The near-term phase leans on proven natural-gas engines from established suppliers, while the longer-term phase depends on advanced Small Modular Reactors, which are still working through technological, regulatory, and cost milestones across the industry. The “hybrid energy park” approach—gas now, SMRs later—is an innovative way to bridge today’s power needs with tomorrow’s low‑carbon goals. Future opportunities, like using steady nuclear output for hydrogen or synthetic fuels, add upside potential but also additional uncertainty and complexity. Overall, the plan is ambitious and forward-looking, but timing, regulation, and technology choices remain major variables.

Summary

HVIIR today is a financial vehicle, not an operating company, so its historical financials provide almost no insight into business performance. The real story is the proposed merger with ONE Nuclear Energy and the strategy to build large, hybrid energy parks serving power‑intensive customers. On paper, the concept targets a growing need—reliable, low‑carbon power for the digital and AI economy—with support from notable partners and an experienced SPAC sponsor. However, the path ahead is long and execution‑heavy: securing permits and sites, choosing SMR technologies, raising large amounts of capital, building complex infrastructure, and managing regulatory and construction risk over many years. The opportunity is significant, but so are the uncertainties, and the company’s future financial profile will depend almost entirely on how well this plan is carried out after the combination closes.