Logo

ILLR

Triller Group Inc.

ILLR

Triller Group Inc. NASDAQ
$0.41 2.73% (+0.01)

Market Cap $61.56 M
52w High $4.06
52w Low $0.33
Dividend Yield 0%
P/E -0.17
Volume 124.19K
Outstanding Shares 151.62M

Income Statement

Period Revenue Operating Expense Net Income Net Profit Margin Earnings Per Share EBITDA
Q2-2024 $4.921M $14.129M $-11.37M -231.054% $-0.14 $-10.997M
Q1-2024 $9.943M $12.46M $-50.411M -507% $-0.39 $-46.396M
Q4-2023 $11.959M $176.419M $-163.538M -1.367K% $-1.33 $-25.142M
Q3-2023 $11.258M $32.262M $-71.543M -635.486% $-0.191 $-13.269M
Q2-2023 $13.178M $29.357M $-31.402M -238.291% $-0.163 $-20.044M

Balance Statement

Period Cash & Short-term Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Equity
Q2-2024 $15.623M $91.326M $97.35M $-6.024M
Q1-2024 $821K $187.508M $348.22M $2.744M
Q4-2023 $1.849M $270.425M $406.887M $-148.107M
Q3-2023 $967K $359.287M $378.369M $-24.435M
Q2-2023 $1.716M $369.673M $333.102M $30.221M

Cash Flow Statement

Period Net Income Cash From Operations Cash From Investing Cash From Financing Net Change Free Cash Flow
Q2-2024 $-11.37M $-7.393M $412.796K $4.956M $-2.105M $-7.393M
Q1-2024 $-51.332M $-3.75M $-524K $2.996M $-1.023M $-4.274M
Q4-2023 $-163.538M $-9.197M $-646K $10.84M $877K $-9.107M
Q3-2023 $-71.543M $-8.158M $-843K $8.242M $-749K $-8.158M
Q2-2023 $-31.402M $-10.159M $-908K $10.683M $-439K $-10.158M

Five-Year Company Overview

Income Statement

Income Statement Triller’s income statement shows a company still very much in the “idea and build” phase rather than the “scale and profit” phase. Revenue is very small and has not grown meaningfully over the last few years. Profitability is weak: gross profit hovers around break-even, while operating and net losses are very large relative to the size of the business. Losses have persisted year after year, with no clear turn toward break-even yet. Overall, the core business model is not yet proven financially, and the company remains heavily loss‑making on a tiny revenue base.


Balance Sheet

Balance Sheet The balance sheet looks thin and stressed. Total assets are small, cash balances have effectively been drawn down to almost nothing in the most recent period, and debt has increased over time. Equity has flipped from slightly positive to clearly negative, meaning liabilities now exceed assets. That combination—very limited cash, rising debt, and negative equity—signals a fragile financial position, little buffer against setbacks, and a likely dependence on external financing or restructuring to support operations.


Cash Flow

Cash Flow Cash flow from operations has been consistently negative, indicating the business consumes cash rather than generates it. Free cash flow is also negative and roughly mirrors operating cash flow, since capital spending is minimal, which is typical for an asset‑light digital platform. The company is essentially funding ongoing losses without investing heavily in physical assets. This pattern underscores the importance of access to new funding sources; the runway is primarily a function of external capital, not internally generated cash.


Competitive Edge

Competitive Edge Triller is trying to stand out in an extremely crowded and winner‑takes‑most market dominated by giants like TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube. Its strategy is unusual: combine a social video app, combat sports and live events (through TrillerTV and BKFC), and creator‑focused fintech. This gives it some differentiation and cross‑promotion potential, but it competes against far larger, better‑capitalized players in social media and streaming. Brand recognition and scale are meaningfully lower than leading platforms, and the company also faces credibility and listing‑status challenges from late filings and delisting notices. In short, the positioning is creative but the competitive and execution headwinds are very strong.


Innovation and R&D

Innovation and R&D Innovation is the clear bright spot. Triller emphasizes AI‑driven video creation, conversational AI for brands, and integrated influencer marketing tools through acquisitions like Amplify.ai and Julius. It is building a creator‑centric ecosystem with direct monetization tools, live pay‑per‑view events, and plans to layer in fintech services via the AGBA partnership. The roadmap includes a major app revamp, expansion of TrillerTV content, and deeper integration of financial services for creators. However, these ambitions require sustained investment and strong execution, which may be challenging given the company’s limited financial resources and intense competition.


Summary

Overall, Triller Group looks like a highly experimental, high‑risk platform play with an interesting vision but a very weak financial base. Strategically, it is trying to fuse social media, live combat sports, and creator‑focused fintech, supported by AI and influencer‑marketing tools. That ecosystem concept is differentiated and could create multiple revenue streams if it gains traction. Financially, though, the numbers tell a cautious story: tiny revenue, persistent large losses, a thin and now negative equity position, increased reliance on debt, and steady cash burn. Governance and reporting issues, including past delisting notices, add further uncertainty. Future outcomes will largely depend on whether Triller can stabilize its finances, successfully relaunch and grow its app and live‑events businesses, and convert its innovation pipeline into scale and sustainable profitability—all of which remain very uncertain at this stage.