Logo

INHD

Inno Holdings Inc. Common Stock

INHD

Inno Holdings Inc. Common Stock NASDAQ
$0.22 -1.02% (-0.00)

Market Cap $1.73 M
52w High $19.78
52w Low $0.20
Dividend Yield 0%
P/E -0.08
Volume 22.81M
Outstanding Shares 7.75M

Income Statement

Period Revenue Operating Expense Net Income Net Profit Margin Earnings Per Share EBITDA
Q3-2025 $1.086M $1.545M $-1.546M -142.351% $-0.3 $-1.561M
Q2-2025 $478.1K $1.411M $-3.62M -757.268% $-1.79 $-1.369M
Q1-2025 $198K $602.301K $-603.697K -304.897% $-0.3 $-583.812K
Q4-2024 $490K $780.355K $-287.152K -58.602% $-0.14 $-273.979K
Q3-2024 $45.682K $1.032M $-1.065M -2.331K% $-0.51 $-1.012M

Balance Statement

Period Cash & Short-term Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Equity
Q3-2025 $4.385M $8.832M $880.702K $7.951M
Q2-2025 $3.889M $7.329M $252.149K $7.077M
Q1-2025 $4.804M $10.7M $1.258M $9.656M
Q4-2024 $1.527M $4.169M $1.372M $3.01M
Q3-2024 $1.891M $4.373M $1.359M $3.225M

Cash Flow Statement

Period Net Income Cash From Operations Cash From Investing Cash From Financing Net Change Free Cash Flow
Q3-2025 $-1.546M $-594.777K $-194K $1.285M $496.473K $-594.777K
Q2-2025 $-3.353M $-578.219K $99.701K $12.719K $-915.322K $-551.365K
Q1-2025 $-605.409K $-2.532M $-1.428M $7.237M $3.277M $-2.559M
Q4-2024 $-324.45K $-215.845K $-134.829K $-13.568K $-364.242K $-350.674K
Q3-2024 $-1.065M $-1.731M $-143K $-280.42K $-2.155M $-1.885M

Revenue by Products

Product Q1-2025Q2-2025Q3-2025
Product
Product
$0 $0 $0
Licensing Income
Licensing Income
$0 $0 $0

Five-Year Company Overview

Income Statement

Income Statement INHD looks like an early-stage, pre-revenue company: the data show no meaningful sales so far and a pattern of consistent losses per share. That means almost all activity is on the cost side – development, overhead, and corporate setup – without a clear revenue base yet. The losses also suggest the business model and pricing power are still unproven in real-world, scaled projects. Overall, the income statement profile is that of a company still in the “building and experimenting” phase rather than one in steady commercial operation.


Balance Sheet

Balance Sheet The balance sheet data provided are essentially empty, which likely reflects reporting gaps rather than a truly asset‑less company. As a recent SPAC listing, INHD probably started with cash and limited operating assets, but from this data alone it’s impossible to judge its true cash cushion, debt levels, or tangible asset base. That makes it hard to assess financial strength, solvency, or dilution risk. Anyone evaluating stability or downside risk would need to rely on the latest detailed filings, because the numbers here do not provide a clear picture of balance sheet health.


Cash Flow

Cash Flow The cash flow information shows only very small reported operating cash outflows and no visible capital spending, which fits an early, low‑scale stage of operations. In practice, a pre‑revenue company with losses is almost certainly consuming cash to fund salaries, technology, and corporate costs, even if the reported amounts here look minimal. The absence of clear, multi‑year cash flow data means it’s difficult to gauge how quickly the company is burning cash or how long its financial runway might be. The key takeaway is that the business appears dependent on external funding rather than internally generated cash at this point.


Competitive Edge

Competitive Edge INHD’s construction technology focuses on cold‑formed steel framing and a “Mobile Factory” that can manufacture components directly on or near the job site. On paper, that could offer faster build times, lower labor needs, and better logistics than traditional wood framing and centralized fabrication, which is a genuine differentiator if customers adopt it at scale. However, the moat is uncertain: large construction and materials firms could potentially develop similar systems, and there is limited evidence yet of broad commercial traction or entrenched customer relationships. The company’s recent move into electronic product trading and Web3 logistics adds further complexity, placing it in highly competitive, crowded digital markets where it currently has no obvious brand or scale advantage. Overall, its competitive position is based more on ideas and prototypes than on proven market share or recurring customer demand.


Innovation and R&D

Innovation and R&D Innovation is clearly the centerpiece of INHD’s story. In construction, it is pushing proprietary steel‑framing processes, AI‑assisted design, the Mobile Factory concept, and modular products like “Caster Cube” homes and the “Village 101” multifamily design. In parallel, it is venturing into a cross‑border B2B electronics marketplace, Web3‑enabled logistics and supply chain tracking, and an AI testing lab for electronics recycling – all of which signal an aggressive, experimental approach to technology and new business models. The upside of this is strong creative energy and multiple ways the story could play out if even one platform gains traction. The downside is strategic dilution: pursuing several unrelated innovation tracks at once can stretch management, capital, and brand focus, especially for a young company with limited resources. Without clear disclosure of R&D spending and prioritization, it is hard to know which innovation bets will actually receive enough funding to mature.


Summary

INHD is best described as a concept‑heavy, early‑stage platform rather than a mature industrial or materials business. Financially, it shows no real revenue yet and an ongoing pattern of losses, with insufficient public data here to judge the true strength of its balance sheet or its cash runway. Strategically, it is trying to build a niche in modern construction through cold‑formed steel framing, modular building systems, and a mobile manufacturing model that, if adopted, could materially change project timelines and site logistics. At the same time, it is pivoting into electronics trading, Web3 logistics, and AI‑related platforms, which introduces both diversification potential and significant execution risk. The company’s future will likely depend on two things: its ability to convert one or more of these innovations into repeatable, paying customer relationships, and its capacity to fund and focus its ambitions without overextending itself financially or strategically. Overall uncertainty is high, with substantial upside and downside tied to execution, capital access, and real‑world market adoption.