Logo

JEM

707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares

JEM

707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares NASDAQ
$0.25 -3.52% (-0.01)

Market Cap $5.53 M
52w High $7.90
52w Low $0.25
Dividend Yield 0%
P/E 4.2
Volume 125.57K
Outstanding Shares 21.95M

Income Statement

Period Revenue Operating Expense Net Income Net Profit Margin Earnings Per Share EBITDA

Balance Statement

Period Cash & Short-term Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Equity
Q4-2024 $12.821M $32.796M $22.389M $10.408M
Q2-2024 $9.77M $28.92M $24.753M $4.167M
Q4-2023 $12.75M $37.243M $34.297M $2.947M

Cash Flow Statement

Period Net Income Cash From Operations Cash From Investing Cash From Financing Net Change Free Cash Flow

Five-Year Company Overview

Income Statement

Income Statement Revenue and profits have been growing from a very small base, which suggests the business is gaining some traction but is still quite early-stage in scale. Gross profit and operating profit have both improved over the last few years, and net income has turned consistently positive rather than just breaking even. Profitability appears relatively solid for the company’s size, but the entire income statement is still very small, which means results can swing quickly if a few clients or orders change.


Balance Sheet

Balance Sheet The balance sheet is light and lean, reflecting the asset‑light strategy. Total assets and equity are modest, and there is some use of debt but not an obvious heavy leverage load. Cash is present but not building, which signals limited financial cushion. Overall, this looks like a small, relatively simple balance sheet with some room to borrow but not a lot of built‑up safety if conditions worsen.


Cash Flow

Cash Flow Cash generation has been uneven. A couple of years ago, the company produced positive operating and free cash flow, but more recently cash flow has been closer to break‑even. Capital spending has been minimal, consistent with an outsourced, asset‑light model. The main watchpoint is whether profits convert reliably into cash over time or whether the business relies more on external funding as it grows.


Competitive Edge

Competitive Edge JEM operates in a very crowded and low‑margin apparel world, but it is positioning itself as a specialist supply chain partner for mid‑sized brands rather than a traditional retailer or basic contractor. Its edge comes from acting as a one‑stop service provider—covering design input, sourcing, production management, quality control, and logistics. That more customized, high‑touch approach could appeal to brands that lack their own global sourcing teams. However, its moat is still developing, and it competes with both large, established sourcing groups and smaller regional players, so maintaining service quality and client relationships will be critical.


Innovation and R&D

Innovation and R&D Instead of heavy in‑house manufacturing, JEM’s innovation is mainly in business model and process. It uses a network of third‑party factories and is planning to upgrade its digital backbone with better planning and HR systems. This could improve visibility, speed, and data‑driven decision making for clients. The company is also exploring newer areas like cryptocurrency reserves, Web3‑based payments, and blockchain‑enabled supply chain tracking, plus potential brand acquisitions and licensing. These initiatives are experimental and add uncertainty, but they show a willingness to try unconventional tools to improve cross‑border operations and diversify revenue.


Summary

JEM is a very small but growing apparel supply chain company that aims to serve mid‑market brands with an end‑to‑end, asset‑light model. Its recent financials show improving profitability from a tiny base and a simple, lean balance sheet, but cash flows have been inconsistent and the financial buffer appears limited. Competitively, the company’s strength lies in integrated services and flexibility rather than scale, which can be an advantage for niche clients but leaves it exposed to larger competitors and changing demand. Its push into digital systems and experimental use of crypto and Web3 could create efficiencies and differentiation if executed well, but they also introduce execution risk. On top of that, the Nasdaq minimum bid price notice underlines that the market is still uncertain about the company’s long‑term trajectory, making future performance highly dependent on consistent execution, cash discipline, and clear evidence that its supply chain solutions can scale sustainably.