NEUP - Neuphoria Therapeut... Stock Analysis | Stock Taper
Logo
Neuphoria Therapeutics Inc.

NEUP

Neuphoria Therapeutics Inc. NASDAQ
$4.15 -4.82% (-0.21)

Market Cap $7.80 M
52w High $21.40
52w Low $3.65
P/E -1.03
Volume 28.78K
Outstanding Shares 1.88M

Income Statement

Period Revenue Operating Expense Net Income Net Profit Margin Earnings Per Share EBITDA
Q2-2026 $0 $3.98M $2.79M 0% $0.41 $-3.98M
Q1-2026 $0 $8.3M $-14.99M 0% $-6.67 $-14.79M
Q4-2025 $-15.66M $16.77B $-378.15M 2.41K% $-6.77 $-846.81M
Q3-2025 $23.87M $4.55M $17.93M 75.08% $6.55 $18.06M
Q2-2025 $1.07M $7.05M $-3.14M -293.24% $-0.01 $-3.12M

What's going well?

The company dramatically reduced its operating expenses and reported a profit this quarter. Losses from operations are shrinking, and there is no debt burden.

What's concerning?

There is still no revenue, and the profit came from a one-off gain, not from selling products or services. Heavy share dilution also hurts existing shareholders.

Balance Statement

Period Cash & Short-term Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Equity
Q2-2026 $22.17M $36.6M $6.9M $29.7M
Q1-2026 $13.65M $27.34M $14.83M $12.51M
Q4-2025 $21.59M $43.44M $14.57M $28.87M
Q3-2025 $17.05M $30.71M $4.72M $26M
Q2-2025 $4.34M $18.17M $4.42M $13.75M

What's financially strong about this company?

The company has a huge cash cushion, almost no debt, and can easily pay all its bills. Equity more than doubled this quarter, and liabilities are very low.

What are the financial risks or weaknesses?

Receivables spiked, which could mean slower customer payments. The company has no physical assets and a long history of losses, shown by negative retained earnings.

Cash Flow Statement

Period Net Income Cash From Operations Cash From Investing Cash From Financing Net Change Free Cash Flow
Q2-2026 $1.86M $-6.44M $0 $22.01M $8.52M $-6.44M
Q1-2026 $-9.91M $-3.79M $0 $3.25M $-3.32M $-3.79M
Q4-2025 $-378.15M $73.57M $0 $1.53B $14.27B $73.57M
Q3-2025 $11.26M $11.45M $0 $1.16M $12.7M $11.45M
Q2-2025 $-1.94M $-3.36M $0 $-107.1K $-3.75M $-3.36M

What's strong about this company's cash flow?

Net income improved sharply, swinging to a profit this quarter. The company was able to raise a large amount of cash by selling shares, giving it a temporary cushion.

What are the cash flow concerns?

Cash burn from operations is getting worse, not better. The company is highly dependent on selling new shares to survive, which dilutes existing shareholders and is not a long-term solution.

5-Year Trend Analysis

A comprehensive look at Neuphoria Therapeutics Inc.'s financial evolution and strategic trajectory over the past five years.

+ Strengths

NEUP combines a significantly strengthened cash and liquidity position, very low debt, and early signs of revenue traction with a differentiated scientific platform and a valuable collaboration with a major pharmaceutical partner. Margins on the revenue it has generated look attractive, operating and net losses have narrowed sharply, and operating cash flow has turned positive. The company retains a focused expertise in neuropsychiatric and cognitive disorders, with multiple shots on goal across BNC210, the Merck‑partnered Alzheimer’s candidate, and earlier‑stage programs.

! Risks

Key risks include the company’s continued lack of consistent profitability, a long history of cumulative losses, and heavy reliance on intangible assets and goodwill that could be impaired if expectations are not met. The clinical and regulatory risk around BNC210 and other pipeline assets remains high, especially after the failure of the social anxiety trial. Strategic uncertainty from the ongoing review, concentration risk around a small set of programs and partners, and the possibility that recent revenue and cash flow improvements prove one‑off rather than recurring all add to the risk profile.

Outlook

The outlook is finely balanced and highly event‑driven. Financially, NEUP now has the resources to navigate several years of development and strategic repositioning, and its most recent results show tangible progress toward a more sustainable model. Strategically, the company stands at a crossroads: the outcome of the strategic review, the fate of BNC210 in PTSD, and the trajectory of the Merck Alzheimer’s program are likely to have far more impact on long‑term value than near‑term quarterly numbers. Overall, NEUP appears better funded and more commercially engaged than in the past, but its future path depends heavily on how successfully it can convert its scientific potential into reliable, recurring economic returns.