Logo

PTLE

PTL Limited

PTLE

PTL Limited NASDAQ
$0.17 0.18% (+0.00)

Market Cap $6.35 M
52w High $15.78
52w Low $0.14
Dividend Yield 0%
P/E -1.55
Volume 352.94K
Outstanding Shares 37.33M

Income Statement

Period Revenue Operating Expense Net Income Net Profit Margin Earnings Per Share EBITDA
Q4-2024 $6.146M $827.51K $-680.241K -11.068% $-0.06 $-663.704K
Q2-2024 $6.43M $91.923K $40.982K 0.637% $0.004 $53.684K
Q4-2023 $7.399M $77.759K $5.451K 0.074% $0 $6.567K
Q2-2023 $5.646M $28.103K $113.985K 2.019% $0.01 $133.196K

Balance Statement

Period Cash & Short-term Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Equity
Q4-2024 $617.093K $12.576M $1.54M $79.061K
Q2-2024 $221.543K $9.628M $7.957M $213.96K
Q4-2023 $146.6K $1.413M $1.24M $172.891K

Cash Flow Statement

Period Net Income Cash From Operations Cash From Investing Cash From Financing Net Change Free Cash Flow
Q4-2024 $-680.241K $-22.025K $0 $608.661K $588.717K $0
Q2-2024 $40.982K $-76.182K $0 $-41.886K $-118.224K $-76.18K
Q4-2023 $5.451K $118.379K $0 $-5.067K $146.6K $118.38K

Five-Year Company Overview

Income Statement

Income Statement PTL Limited’s income statement reflects a small, very simple business built around lease rentals rather than active operations. Revenue has been steady at a low level, with limited direct costs, so gross and operating profits tend to hover close to break-even. Earnings per share have moved from modestly positive to slightly negative most recently, suggesting some pressure from costs, one‑off items, or accounting adjustments rather than a major operational swing. Overall, the pattern is one of stability in the top line with only mild variability at the bottom line, typical of a single‑asset, lease‑based company.


Balance Sheet

Balance Sheet The balance sheet is lean and uncomplicated, dominated by the value of the leased manufacturing facility and associated land. There is effectively no financial debt in the recent history shown, which reduces balance‑sheet risk but also means growth is not being driven by borrowing. Asset and equity levels appear broadly stable, pointing to a business that is not aggressively expanding or shrinking. The flip side is that the company may not hold large cash reserves, so its financial flexibility likely depends on continuing lease inflows and conservative cost management.


Cash Flow

Cash Flow Cash flow is largely a reflection of lease income coming in and relatively modest operating expenses going out. With little to no capital expenditure or expansion projects, free cash flow should generally track operating cash flow quite closely. This structure tends to produce predictable cash generation, assuming the lease is honored and runs smoothly. However, the lack of growth investment also means cash flows are more about maintaining the current state of the business than about funding future expansion.


Competitive Edge

Competitive Edge PTL’s competitive position rests almost entirely on its long‑term lease of a strategically important tire plant to Apollo Tyres. The tenant has already invested heavily in the facility, making it costly and disruptive to relocate, which strengthens PTL’s bargaining position and supports the stability of its income. The location and underlying land carry strategic value and could have alternative uses over time, adding another layer to the company’s economic moat. The main vulnerability is extreme customer concentration: dependence on a single tenant and a single contract that must eventually be renewed on favorable terms.


Innovation and R&D

Innovation and R&D Traditional innovation and research spending are not central to PTL’s model, since it does not operate the plant or produce tires itself. Instead, its “innovation” is more strategic and contractual: structuring and managing a long‑term lease that aligns with the needs of a major tire manufacturer. Technological progress and capital upgrades are largely driven by Apollo Tyres, while PTL acts as the asset owner and landlord. Over time, any creative moves are more likely to involve new uses of its land, revised lease structures, or capital allocation decisions than classic product R&D.


Summary

PTL Limited is essentially a focused, asset‑holding company whose performance is tied to one key industrial property and a long‑dated lease with Apollo Tyres. Financially, it shows modest, fairly stable income with small swings in profitability, supported by a clean, low‑debt balance sheet and straightforward cash flows. The main strengths are predictability, simplicity, and the strategic importance of the leased plant and land. The main risks are concentration in a single tenant and limited organic growth drivers, with a crucial dependency on how lease terms evolve as the current agreement approaches expiry. Overall, PTL exemplifies a steady, lease‑driven model where future value will hinge on contract renewals, land monetization options, and disciplined capital allocation rather than rapid business expansion.