Logo

RMCO

Royalty Management Holding Corporation

RMCO

Royalty Management Holding Corporation • NASDAQ
$2.34 ▲ 2.63% (+0.06)
Market Cap $35.41 M
52w High $4.76
52w Low $0.90
Dividend Yield 0.01%
P/E -117
Volume 204
Outstanding Shares 15.13M

Income Statement

Period Revenue Operating Expense Net Income Net Profit Margin Earnings Per Share EBITDA
Q3-2025 $1.303M ▼ $229.89K ▼ $-209.095K ▼ -16.049% ▼ $-0.01 ▼ $-189.578K ▼
Q2-2025 $1.327M ▲ $273.334K ▼ $-49.528K ▲ -3.732% ▲ $-0.003 ▲ $-27.696K ▼
Q1-2025 $923.223K ▲ $364.533K ▲ $-58.755K ▼ -6.364% ▲ $-0.004 ▼ $-18.027K ▼
Q4-2024 $245.133K ▲ $266.511K ▼ $-31.861K ▲ -12.997% ▲ $-0.002 ▲ $-9.268K ▲
Q3-2024 $145.633K $302.958K $-112.471K -77.229% $-0.007 $-66.936K

Balance Statement

Period Cash & Short-term Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Equity
Q3-2025 $173.174K ▲ $18.018M ▲ $3.954M ▲ $14.064M ▲
Q2-2025 $146.728K ▲ $16.86M ▲ $2.926M ▲ $13.934M ▼
Q1-2025 $132.539K ▲ $15.723M ▲ $1.742M ▲ $13.981M ▲
Q4-2024 $114.138K ▼ $15.041M ▼ $1.415M ▼ $13.626M ▲
Q3-2024 $145.367K $15.395M $1.846M $13.549M

Cash Flow Statement

Period Net Income Cash From Operations Cash From Investing Cash From Financing Net Change Free Cash Flow
Q3-2025 $-209.095K ▼ $21.933K ▼ $-15.104K ▲ $19.617K ▲ $26.446K ▲ $21.93K ▼
Q2-2025 $-49.528K ▲ $250.204K ▲ $-168.605K ▼ $-67.41K ▼ $14.189K ▼ $250.204K ▲
Q1-2025 $-58.755K ▼ $-327.12K ▼ $-5.722K ▼ $351.243K ▲ $18.401K ▲ $-327.12K ▼
Q4-2024 $-31.861K ▲ $-211.132K ▼ $190.428K ▲ $-2K ▲ $-31.229K ▼ $-211.13K ▼
Q3-2024 $-112.471K $1.55M $-126.382K $-1.317M $106.234K $1.55M

Five-Year Company Overview

Income Statement

Income Statement RMCO’s historical income statement still looks like that of a very early-stage company. Reported revenue over the past few years rounds down to essentially nothing, and the business has been running at small but persistent losses. Those losses widened in the middle of the period and then improved more recently, which suggests some progress on costs or mix, but the company is not yet demonstrating a proven, recurring earnings engine in its filed numbers. The separate narrative about strong recent revenue growth in environmental services and digital initiatives is not yet reflected in the historical line items provided here, so there is a clear gap between the strategy story and the reported base of financial performance.

Balance Sheet

Balance Sheet The balance sheet is very small and quite light. RMCO has only a modest asset base and a thin layer of shareholder equity, with essentially no reported financial debt. That combination means the company is not weighed down by leverage, but it also lacks a substantial capital cushion. Cash balances appear minimal, so the company’s ability to fund new deals and withstand setbacks likely depends on continued access to external capital or future cash generation rather than on existing balance sheet strength.

Cash Flow

Cash Flow Cash flow so far is limited and not yet a clear source of strength. Operating cash flow has been close to flat, with just a brief period of slight positive momentum, and investment spending has been very modest, indicating a capital-light model but also a small operational footprint. Free cash flow is not yet meaningfully positive on a sustained basis, so the business currently looks more like a developing platform than a self-funding cash generator. Future success will depend on translating its portfolio strategy into stable, recurring cash inflows that can support growth without constant new funding.

Competitive Edge

Competitive Edge RMCO is trying to differentiate itself by applying a royalty and asset-management model to a mix of “underserved” assets: environmental services, natural resources, intellectual property, and now digital infrastructure. This diversified approach can help spread risk across sectors, and the environmental services segment appears to be emerging as an early anchor for the business. The new digital infrastructure subsidiary, focused on data centers, AI servers, and alternative currency mining, could offer a first-mover edge if executed well. However, the company is very small and young, operating in markets where much larger, well-funded competitors also hunt for attractive assets, so its competitive position remains more aspirational than proven at this stage.

Innovation and R&D

Innovation and R&D Innovation at RMCO is less about laboratory-style R&D and more about creative structuring and asset selection. The company is experimenting with applying royalty-style economics to areas like environmental services, rare resources, intellectual property, blockchain-related assets, and now digital infrastructure through The Vault Holding Corporation. This is a relatively novel blend of traditional royalty concepts with new-economy themes such as data centers and AI workloads. The upside is the potential to tap into fast-growing areas without owning heavy infrastructure directly; the downside is execution risk, technological obsolescence risk in digital assets, and the need to keep sourcing and underwriting attractive deals better than larger rivals. Progress on The Vault, continued wins in environmental services, and clearer disclosure on the intellectual property portfolio will be key markers of whether this innovation is translating into durable value.

Summary

In summary, RMCO looks like a very early-stage, concept-driven asset manager and royalty platform whose financial statements still show minimal revenue and small ongoing losses. The balance sheet is light but largely unlevered, which reduces financial strain but also highlights how limited its current scale is. Cash flows are not yet robust, so the company is still in the “build and prove” phase rather than the “harvest” phase. Strategically, it is aiming to carve out a niche in specialized and sometimes emerging asset classes, with environmental services and digital infrastructure as early pillars. The big opportunity is to turn this diversified, royalty-focused model into a steady, scalable stream of cash flows; the main risks are execution, competition from much larger players, and the gap between the ambitious strategy narrative and the still-thin historical financial record. Uncertainty is high, and future results will depend heavily on how well current projects and acquisitions are implemented over the next several years.