SAY
SAY
Saratoga Investment Corp 8.125%Income Statement
| Period | Revenue | Operating Expense | Net Income | Net Profit Margin | Earnings Per Share | EBITDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2026 | $14.92M ▼ | $3.1M ▼ | $-2.61M ▼ | -17.52% ▼ | $-0.16 ▼ | $-750.41K ▼ |
| Q3-2026 | $27.25M ▼ | $3.39M ▲ | $12M ▼ | 44.04% ▼ | $0.74 ▼ | $11.95M ▼ |
| Q2-2026 | $27.76M ▼ | $2.54M ▼ | $13.29M ▼ | 47.86% ▲ | $0.84 ▼ | $12.85M ▼ |
| Q1-2026 | $29.29M ▲ | $2.8M ▲ | $13.93M ▲ | 47.56% ▲ | $0.91 ▲ | $14.04M ▲ |
| Q4-2025 | $17.47M | $2.19M | $-676.76K | -3.87% | $-0.05 | $2.36M |
Balance Statement
| Period | Cash & Short-term | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Total Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2026 | $21.79M ▼ | $1.14B ▼ | $744.95M ▼ | $396.16M ▼ |
| Q3-2026 | $52.3M ▼ | $1.2B ▼ | $783.76M ▼ | $413.21M ▲ |
| Q2-2026 | $105.66M ▼ | $1.21B ▲ | $795.71M ▼ | $410.5M ▲ |
| Q1-2026 | $131.56M ▼ | $1.2B ▲ | $805.9M ▲ | $396.37M ▲ |
| Q4-2025 | $148.22M | $1.19B | $798.88M | $392.67M |
Cash Flow Statement
| Period | Net Income | Cash From Operations | Cash From Investing | Cash From Financing | Net Change | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2026 | $-2.61M ▼ | $-92.42M ▼ | $0 | $-55.36M ▼ | $-147.77M ▼ | $-92.42M ▼ |
| Q3-2026 | $12M ▼ | $-8.6M ▲ | $0 | $-22.64M ▼ | $-31.25M ▼ | $-8.6M ▲ |
| Q2-2026 | $13.29M ▼ | $-19.3M ▼ | $0 | $-4.18M ▲ | $-23.48M ▼ | $-19.3M ▼ |
| Q1-2026 | $13.93M ▲ | $32.29M ▲ | $0 | $-12.73M ▲ | $19.56M ▲ | $32.29M ▲ |
| Q4-2025 | $-676.76K | $-19.92M | $0 | $-25.52M | $-45.44M | $-19.92M |
Q4 2026 Earnings Call Summary
Read Call Summary5-Year Trend Analysis
A comprehensive look at Saratoga Investment Corp 8.125%'s financial evolution and strategic trajectory over the past five years.
Key positives include a clear strategic focus on the U.S. lower‑middle‑market, where Saratoga has built long‑standing sponsor relationships and a reputation for tailored financing solutions. The firm benefits from an experienced investment team and a disciplined underwriting process, which historically have supported returns above the BDC industry average. The asset base is substantial, cash on hand is meaningful in absolute terms, and the product set is flexible, spanning different layers of the capital structure. Collectively, these factors suggest a business model with real commercial traction and a niche that is understood and repeatable.
The most prominent concerns stem from the financial profile indicated by the provided data. Operating income and EBITDA are negative despite solid revenue, implying that the business is not currently covering its cost base and interest expense. The balance sheet shows very high leverage, entirely short‑term debt, and deeply negative equity, which together point to elevated solvency and refinancing risk. Liquidity ratios are very weak, and cash flows from operations and free cash flow are sharply negative, even as large dividends are being paid out. There is only one year of data and some reporting anomalies—including positive earnings per share alongside zero net income—so these conclusions are subject to uncertainty, but the directional signals are clearly cautious.
Looking forward, much depends on whether Saratoga can align its strong market positioning with a more resilient financial structure. A constructive path would involve stabilizing and improving operating profitability, restoring positive operating and free cash flow, and gradually reducing reliance on short‑term debt or bolstering the equity base. The firm’s niche focus, deal pipeline, and historical return record suggest it has the commercial capabilities to generate attractive economics, but the current combination of leverage, liquidity tightness, and cash burn adds meaningful execution risk. For observers, the key variables to monitor are trends in credit performance, funding access, cash generation, and any steps taken to strengthen the balance sheet, recognizing that the present snapshot is only one period and may not capture the full trajectory of the business.
About Saratoga Investment Corp 8.125%
http://www.saratogainvestmentcorp.comSaratoga Investment Corp. is a specialty finance company that invests primarily in leveraged loans and mezzanine debt issued by U.S. middle-market companies, both through direct lending and through participation in loan syndicates. It has elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
Income Statement
| Period | Revenue | Operating Expense | Net Income | Net Profit Margin | Earnings Per Share | EBITDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2026 | $14.92M ▼ | $3.1M ▼ | $-2.61M ▼ | -17.52% ▼ | $-0.16 ▼ | $-750.41K ▼ |
| Q3-2026 | $27.25M ▼ | $3.39M ▲ | $12M ▼ | 44.04% ▼ | $0.74 ▼ | $11.95M ▼ |
| Q2-2026 | $27.76M ▼ | $2.54M ▼ | $13.29M ▼ | 47.86% ▲ | $0.84 ▼ | $12.85M ▼ |
| Q1-2026 | $29.29M ▲ | $2.8M ▲ | $13.93M ▲ | 47.56% ▲ | $0.91 ▲ | $14.04M ▲ |
| Q4-2025 | $17.47M | $2.19M | $-676.76K | -3.87% | $-0.05 | $2.36M |
Balance Statement
| Period | Cash & Short-term | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Total Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2026 | $21.79M ▼ | $1.14B ▼ | $744.95M ▼ | $396.16M ▼ |
| Q3-2026 | $52.3M ▼ | $1.2B ▼ | $783.76M ▼ | $413.21M ▲ |
| Q2-2026 | $105.66M ▼ | $1.21B ▲ | $795.71M ▼ | $410.5M ▲ |
| Q1-2026 | $131.56M ▼ | $1.2B ▲ | $805.9M ▲ | $396.37M ▲ |
| Q4-2025 | $148.22M | $1.19B | $798.88M | $392.67M |
Cash Flow Statement
| Period | Net Income | Cash From Operations | Cash From Investing | Cash From Financing | Net Change | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2026 | $-2.61M ▼ | $-92.42M ▼ | $0 | $-55.36M ▼ | $-147.77M ▼ | $-92.42M ▼ |
| Q3-2026 | $12M ▼ | $-8.6M ▲ | $0 | $-22.64M ▼ | $-31.25M ▼ | $-8.6M ▲ |
| Q2-2026 | $13.29M ▼ | $-19.3M ▼ | $0 | $-4.18M ▲ | $-23.48M ▼ | $-19.3M ▼ |
| Q1-2026 | $13.93M ▲ | $32.29M ▲ | $0 | $-12.73M ▲ | $19.56M ▲ | $32.29M ▲ |
| Q4-2025 | $-676.76K | $-19.92M | $0 | $-25.52M | $-45.44M | $-19.92M |
Q4 2026 Earnings Call Summary
Read Call Summary5-Year Trend Analysis
A comprehensive look at Saratoga Investment Corp 8.125%'s financial evolution and strategic trajectory over the past five years.
Key positives include a clear strategic focus on the U.S. lower‑middle‑market, where Saratoga has built long‑standing sponsor relationships and a reputation for tailored financing solutions. The firm benefits from an experienced investment team and a disciplined underwriting process, which historically have supported returns above the BDC industry average. The asset base is substantial, cash on hand is meaningful in absolute terms, and the product set is flexible, spanning different layers of the capital structure. Collectively, these factors suggest a business model with real commercial traction and a niche that is understood and repeatable.
The most prominent concerns stem from the financial profile indicated by the provided data. Operating income and EBITDA are negative despite solid revenue, implying that the business is not currently covering its cost base and interest expense. The balance sheet shows very high leverage, entirely short‑term debt, and deeply negative equity, which together point to elevated solvency and refinancing risk. Liquidity ratios are very weak, and cash flows from operations and free cash flow are sharply negative, even as large dividends are being paid out. There is only one year of data and some reporting anomalies—including positive earnings per share alongside zero net income—so these conclusions are subject to uncertainty, but the directional signals are clearly cautious.
Looking forward, much depends on whether Saratoga can align its strong market positioning with a more resilient financial structure. A constructive path would involve stabilizing and improving operating profitability, restoring positive operating and free cash flow, and gradually reducing reliance on short‑term debt or bolstering the equity base. The firm’s niche focus, deal pipeline, and historical return record suggest it has the commercial capabilities to generate attractive economics, but the current combination of leverage, liquidity tightness, and cash burn adds meaningful execution risk. For observers, the key variables to monitor are trends in credit performance, funding access, cash generation, and any steps taken to strengthen the balance sheet, recognizing that the present snapshot is only one period and may not capture the full trajectory of the business.

CEO
Chris Long Oberbeck
Compensation Summary
(Year )
Upcoming Earnings
Ratings Snapshot
Rating : C

