SDHC
SDHC
Smith Douglas Homes Corp.Income Statement
| Period | Revenue | Operating Expense | Net Income | Net Profit Margin | Earnings Per Share | EBITDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2025 | $260.43M ▼ | $35.99M ▼ | $3.52M ▲ | 1.35% ▲ | $0.39 ▲ | $16.86M ▼ |
| Q3-2025 | $262.04M ▲ | $36.09M ▲ | $2.13M ▼ | 0.81% ▼ | $0.24 ▼ | $18.83M ▲ |
| Q2-2025 | $223.92M ▼ | $34.7M ▲ | $2.37M ▼ | 1.06% ▼ | $0.26 ▼ | $18.53M ▼ |
| Q1-2025 | $224.72M ▼ | $33M ▼ | $2.68M ▼ | 1.19% ▼ | $0.3 ▼ | $20.72M ▼ |
| Q4-2024 | $287.49M | $42.9M | $4.11M | 1.43% | $0.46 | $31.32M |
Balance Statement
| Period | Cash & Short-term | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Total Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2025 | $12.74M ▼ | $557.59M ▼ | $113.46M ▼ | $86.73M ▲ |
| Q3-2025 | $14.78M ▼ | $571.56M ▲ | $145.12M ▼ | $82.18M ▲ |
| Q2-2025 | $16.78M ▲ | $570.22M ▲ | $155.39M ▲ | $79.98M ▲ |
| Q1-2025 | $12.65M ▼ | $513.92M ▲ | $106.76M ▲ | $76.86M ▲ |
| Q4-2024 | $22.36M | $475.9M | $74.17M | $73.63M |
Cash Flow Statement
| Period | Net Income | Cash From Operations | Cash From Investing | Cash From Financing | Net Change | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2025 | $17.05M ▲ | $9.76M ▼ | $-1.06M ▲ | $-10.73M ▲ | $-2.03M ▼ | $8.74M ▼ |
| Q3-2025 | $16.21M ▼ | $22.75M ▲ | $-1.35M ▲ | $-23.41M ▼ | $-2M ▼ | $21.4M ▲ |
| Q2-2025 | $16.43M ▼ | $-28.94M ▲ | $-2.12M ▼ | $35.19M ▲ | $4.13M ▲ | $-31.06M ▲ |
| Q1-2025 | $18.71M ▼ | $-34.91M ▼ | $-2.11M ▼ | $27.3M ▲ | $-9.71M ▼ | $-35.94M ▼ |
| Q4-2024 | $28.79M | $5.48M | $-926K | $-5.9M | $-1.35M | $4.8M |
Revenue by Products
| Product | Q1-2025 | Q2-2025 | Q3-2025 | Q4-2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Central | $90.00M ▲ | $80.00M ▼ | $100.00M ▲ | $100.00M ▲ |
Revenue by Geography
| Region | Q1-2025 | Q2-2025 | Q3-2025 | Q4-2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Central | $90.00M ▲ | $80.00M ▼ | $100.00M ▲ | $100.00M ▲ |
Southeast | $140.00M ▲ | $140.00M ▲ | $170.00M ▲ | $160.00M ▼ |
Q4 2025 Earnings Call Summary
Read Call Summary5-Year Trend Analysis
A comprehensive look at Smith Douglas Homes Corp.'s financial evolution and strategic trajectory over the past five years.
Key strengths include a conservative balance sheet with low net debt and very strong liquidity, an operating model tailored to affordable housing demand, and a land‑light strategy that limits exposure to land value swings. The company’s process‑driven approach to building, supported by its scheduling and ERP systems, underpins fast cycle times and cost efficiency. On the reported numbers, profitability and cash generation look healthy, and management has already taken steps to reduce leverage while still returning cash to shareholders.
The most immediate analytical risk is data quality and transparency, as the income statement for the latest period lacks a conventional revenue line, making it difficult to judge true earnings power and operating performance. Structurally, the business remains exposed to the housing cycle, mortgage rates, and regional economic conditions, which can quickly affect demand and pricing in its entry‑level niche. Heavy inventory and working capital requirements, competition from larger builders, potential construction cost inflation, and the possibility that recent cash returns exceeded sustainable free cash flow all represent ongoing areas of concern.
From a qualitative standpoint, the combination of a clear focus on affordable housing, a land‑light model, and strong liquidity positions Smith Douglas reasonably well to navigate both growth opportunities and cyclical downturns. The company’s operational innovations and disciplined processes could allow it to maintain attractive returns if demand remains steady in its core markets. However, until more normalized financial statements with clear revenue and multi‑period trends are available, any forward view should be treated as provisional, with particular attention paid to how reported earnings, cash flows, and inventory levels evolve over the next several reporting cycles.
About Smith Douglas Homes Corp.
https://smithdouglas.comSmith Douglas Homes Corp. engages in the design, construction, and sale of single-family homes in the southeastern United States. The company operates in metropolitan Atlanta, Birmingham, Charlotte, Huntsville, Nashville, Raleigh-Durham, and Houston. It also provides closing, escrow, and title insurance services. The company was founded in 2008 and is headquartered in Woodstock, Georgia.
Income Statement
| Period | Revenue | Operating Expense | Net Income | Net Profit Margin | Earnings Per Share | EBITDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2025 | $260.43M ▼ | $35.99M ▼ | $3.52M ▲ | 1.35% ▲ | $0.39 ▲ | $16.86M ▼ |
| Q3-2025 | $262.04M ▲ | $36.09M ▲ | $2.13M ▼ | 0.81% ▼ | $0.24 ▼ | $18.83M ▲ |
| Q2-2025 | $223.92M ▼ | $34.7M ▲ | $2.37M ▼ | 1.06% ▼ | $0.26 ▼ | $18.53M ▼ |
| Q1-2025 | $224.72M ▼ | $33M ▼ | $2.68M ▼ | 1.19% ▼ | $0.3 ▼ | $20.72M ▼ |
| Q4-2024 | $287.49M | $42.9M | $4.11M | 1.43% | $0.46 | $31.32M |
Balance Statement
| Period | Cash & Short-term | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Total Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2025 | $12.74M ▼ | $557.59M ▼ | $113.46M ▼ | $86.73M ▲ |
| Q3-2025 | $14.78M ▼ | $571.56M ▲ | $145.12M ▼ | $82.18M ▲ |
| Q2-2025 | $16.78M ▲ | $570.22M ▲ | $155.39M ▲ | $79.98M ▲ |
| Q1-2025 | $12.65M ▼ | $513.92M ▲ | $106.76M ▲ | $76.86M ▲ |
| Q4-2024 | $22.36M | $475.9M | $74.17M | $73.63M |
Cash Flow Statement
| Period | Net Income | Cash From Operations | Cash From Investing | Cash From Financing | Net Change | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2025 | $17.05M ▲ | $9.76M ▼ | $-1.06M ▲ | $-10.73M ▲ | $-2.03M ▼ | $8.74M ▼ |
| Q3-2025 | $16.21M ▼ | $22.75M ▲ | $-1.35M ▲ | $-23.41M ▼ | $-2M ▼ | $21.4M ▲ |
| Q2-2025 | $16.43M ▼ | $-28.94M ▲ | $-2.12M ▼ | $35.19M ▲ | $4.13M ▲ | $-31.06M ▲ |
| Q1-2025 | $18.71M ▼ | $-34.91M ▼ | $-2.11M ▼ | $27.3M ▲ | $-9.71M ▼ | $-35.94M ▼ |
| Q4-2024 | $28.79M | $5.48M | $-926K | $-5.9M | $-1.35M | $4.8M |
Revenue by Products
| Product | Q1-2025 | Q2-2025 | Q3-2025 | Q4-2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Central | $90.00M ▲ | $80.00M ▼ | $100.00M ▲ | $100.00M ▲ |
Revenue by Geography
| Region | Q1-2025 | Q2-2025 | Q3-2025 | Q4-2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Central | $90.00M ▲ | $80.00M ▼ | $100.00M ▲ | $100.00M ▲ |
Southeast | $140.00M ▲ | $140.00M ▲ | $170.00M ▲ | $160.00M ▼ |
Q4 2025 Earnings Call Summary
Read Call Summary5-Year Trend Analysis
A comprehensive look at Smith Douglas Homes Corp.'s financial evolution and strategic trajectory over the past five years.
Key strengths include a conservative balance sheet with low net debt and very strong liquidity, an operating model tailored to affordable housing demand, and a land‑light strategy that limits exposure to land value swings. The company’s process‑driven approach to building, supported by its scheduling and ERP systems, underpins fast cycle times and cost efficiency. On the reported numbers, profitability and cash generation look healthy, and management has already taken steps to reduce leverage while still returning cash to shareholders.
The most immediate analytical risk is data quality and transparency, as the income statement for the latest period lacks a conventional revenue line, making it difficult to judge true earnings power and operating performance. Structurally, the business remains exposed to the housing cycle, mortgage rates, and regional economic conditions, which can quickly affect demand and pricing in its entry‑level niche. Heavy inventory and working capital requirements, competition from larger builders, potential construction cost inflation, and the possibility that recent cash returns exceeded sustainable free cash flow all represent ongoing areas of concern.
From a qualitative standpoint, the combination of a clear focus on affordable housing, a land‑light model, and strong liquidity positions Smith Douglas reasonably well to navigate both growth opportunities and cyclical downturns. The company’s operational innovations and disciplined processes could allow it to maintain attractive returns if demand remains steady in its core markets. However, until more normalized financial statements with clear revenue and multi‑period trends are available, any forward view should be treated as provisional, with particular attention paid to how reported earnings, cash flows, and inventory levels evolve over the next several reporting cycles.

CEO
Gregory S. Bennett
Compensation Summary
(Year 2024)
Upcoming Earnings
ETFs Holding This Stock
Summary
Showing Top 3 of 15
Ratings Snapshot
Rating : B+
Most Recent Analyst Grades
JP Morgan
Neutral
Wells Fargo
Equal Weight
RBC Capital
Sector Perform
B of A Securities
Underperform
Grade Summary
Showing Top 4 of 4
Price Target
Institutional Ownership
KAYNE ANDERSON RUDNICK INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC
Shares:1.47M
Value:$19.96M
CONIFER MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.
Shares:1.43M
Value:$19.48M
WASATCH ADVISORS LP
Shares:1.25M
Value:$16.99M
Summary
Showing Top 3 of 66

