SKYE - Skye Bioscience, Inc. Stock Analysis | Stock Taper
Logo
Skye Bioscience, Inc.

SKYE

Skye Bioscience, Inc. NASDAQ
$0.74 -3.39% (-0.03)

Market Cap $23.88 M
52w High $5.75
52w Low $0.68
P/E -0.57
Volume 85.07K
Outstanding Shares 32.06M

Income Statement

Period Revenue Operating Expense Net Income Net Profit Margin Earnings Per Share EBITDA
Q3-2025 $0 $13.26M $-12.75M 0% $-0.32 $-12.58M
Q2-2025 $0 $18.24M $-17.62M 0% $-0.44 $-17.43M
Q1-2025 $0 $11.76M $-11.1M 0% $-0.28 $-10.92M
Q4-2024 $0 $10.67M $-9.75M 0% $-0.24 $-9.62M
Q3-2024 $0 $4.97M $-3.9M 0% $-0.1 $-3.54M

What's going well?

The company reduced its net loss by nearly $5 million, mainly by cutting R&D spending. Operating expenses are down, and EPS improved from -$0.44 to -$0.32 per share.

What's concerning?

SKYE still has zero revenue and continues to burn cash every quarter. Without sales, the business remains unproven and dependent on outside funding.

Balance Statement

Period Cash & Short-term Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Equity
Q3-2025 $35.31M $41.32M $8.49M $32.84M
Q2-2025 $48.59M $52.16M $8.48M $43.68M
Q1-2025 $59.22M $64.79M $5.54M $59.25M
Q4-2024 $68.42M $72.76M $4.61M $68.15M
Q3-2024 $67.41M $81.54M $5.73M $75.8M

What's financially strong about this company?

SKYE is sitting on a big pile of cash and investments, with almost no debt to worry about. Their assets are high quality and liquid, and they can easily cover all their bills.

What are the financial risks or weaknesses?

The company is burning through cash, with equity and cash balances dropping sharply this quarter. Retained earnings are deeply negative, showing a long history of losses.

Cash Flow Statement

Period Net Income Cash From Operations Cash From Investing Cash From Financing Net Change Free Cash Flow
Q3-2025 $-12.75M $-13.36M $7.97M $0 $-5.4M $-13.36M
Q2-2025 $-17.62M $-10.75M $-11.86M $18.16K $-22.58M $-10.75M
Q1-2025 $-11.1M $-9.19B $-12.81B $0 $-21.99B $-9.19B
Q4-2024 $-9.75M $-8.17M $90.41K $5.62K $-8.08M $-8.22M
Q3-2024 $-3.9M $-5.26M $-1.45M $0 $-6.71M $-6.78M

What's strong about this company's cash flow?

Net losses have narrowed compared to last quarter, and the company is not taking on debt or diluting shareholders with new stock. Capital spending is minimal, so most cash burn is from core operations.

What are the cash flow concerns?

Cash burn is rising, working capital is now a drag, and the company has only a few quarters of cash left at this rate. No new funding this quarter means they will need to raise money soon if losses continue.

Q3 2025 Earnings Call Summary

Read Call Summary

5-Year Trend Analysis

A comprehensive look at Skye Bioscience, Inc.'s financial evolution and strategic trajectory over the past five years.

+ Strengths

Skye Bioscience now has a materially stronger balance sheet, with ample cash and low debt, giving it time to execute on its strategy. It operates in a large and expanding therapeutic area with high unmet need, and its lead program is designed around a clearly differentiated, science‑driven approach. Robust patent coverage, a technology collaboration with Halozyme, and a tight strategic focus on nimacimab all support a coherent story of targeted innovation rather than a scattered set of projects.

! Risks

At the same time, the company has no revenue, significant and growing cash burn, and a long path to any potential commercialization. Clinical risk is high, as underlined by the recent Phase 2a shortfall at initial dosing, and the business is heavily concentrated in one main asset. Skye depends on continued access to capital markets, with a history of share issuance and dilution, and operates against much larger competitors who may move faster or deliver more compelling data.

Outlook

Looking ahead, Skye’s trajectory will be driven primarily by the results of higher‑dose and combination trials for nimacimab and by how efficiently it uses its strengthened cash position. Successful demonstration of meaningful weight loss and a favorable safety profile—especially in combination with GLP‑1 agents—could materially improve its standing in the obesity landscape. Conversely, further clinical disappointments or delays would pressure both its funding options and strategic flexibility. Overall, the outlook is highly uncertain and binary in nature, typical of a small, clinical‑stage biotech making a focused bet on a single lead program.