Logo

ZOOZW

ZOOZ Strategy Ltd.

ZOOZW

ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. • NASDAQ
$0.07 ▲ 0.14% (+0.00)
Market Cap $858200
52w High $0.16
52w Low $0.07
Dividend Yield 0%
P/E 0
Volume 4.19K
Outstanding Shares 12.14M

Income Statement

Period Revenue Operating Expense Net Income Net Profit Margin Earnings Per Share EBITDA
Q2-2025 $415.96K ▼ $8.925M ▼ $-11.864M ▼ -2.852K% ▼ $-1.03 ▼ $-11.273M ▼
Q4-2024 $928.346K ▼ $9.067M ▼ $-10.724M ▼ -1.155K% ▼ $-0.95 ▲ $-9.446M ▼
Q2-2024 $1.002M ▲ $9.317M ▲ $-9.66M ▲ -964.457% ▼ $-1.09 ▲ $-9.398M ▲
Q4-2023 $-72.288K ▼ $-75.87M ▼ $-28.714M ▼ 39.722K% ▲ $-4.86 ▼ $-27.955M ▼
Q2-2023 $2.815M $21.073M $-21.1M -749.556% $-3.38 $-20.797M

Balance Statement

Period Cash & Short-term Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Equity
Q2-2025 $2.489M ▼ $6.551M ▼ $6.697M ▲ $-146K ▼
Q4-2024 $7.532M ▼ $12.837M ▼ $6.119M ▼ $6.718M ▼
Q2-2024 $42.391M ▼ $68.012M ▼ $23.106M ▲ $44.906M ▼
Q2-2023 $50.193M ▼ $73.991M ▼ $18.204M ▲ $55.787M ▼
Q2-2022 $93.97M $107.713M $10.672M $95.682M

Cash Flow Statement

Period Net Income Cash From Operations Cash From Investing Cash From Financing Net Change Free Cash Flow
Q2-2025 $-11.864M ▼ $-17.797M ▼ $-327.176K ▼ $122.241K ▼ $-19.311M ▼ $-8.489M ▼
Q4-2024 $-10.462M ▼ $-14.486M ▼ $13.665M ▲ $127.069K ▼ $-1.519M ▼ $-7.123M ▲
Q2-2024 $-9.886M ▲ $-11.402M ▲ $-6.679M ▼ $20.25M ▲ $1.971M ▲ $-11.474M ▲
Q4-2023 $-14.357M ▼ $-12.151M ▼ $-1.018M ▼ $224K ▲ $-12.998M ▼ $-13.161M ▼
Q2-2023 $-10.55M $-10.666M $-688.5K $101.5K $-11.097M $-11.351M

Five-Year Company Overview

Income Statement

Income Statement ZOOZ Strategy is still essentially a pre‑revenue company: it has not yet converted its technology into meaningful sales. The income statement shows a pattern of small but persistent losses rather than any sustained profitability. Expenses appear to be kept relatively lean for an industrial technology business, but without revenue, even modest costs translate into ongoing losses per share. Overall, this is an early‑stage profile: the business is still in the “building and proving” phase, not yet in the “scaling and earning” phase.

Balance Sheet

Balance Sheet The balance sheet is small and simple. Assets are limited and dominated by cash, with no reported financial debt and positive equity. That means the company is not burdened by interest payments and has a clean financial structure, but also operates with a thin capital base. In practice, this suggests a company that is financially light, reliant on its cash reserves and, over time, on access to new funding rather than on internally generated profits.

Cash Flow

Cash Flow Cash flow from operations has been consistently negative, reflecting ongoing cash burn to cover salaries, R&D, and overhead without offsetting revenue. Free cash flow is also negative, although capital spending has been minimal, so the main use of cash is simply running the business rather than building heavy assets. This pattern is typical of an early‑stage technology firm but underscores that the company will likely need periodic capital infusions or strategic funding to sustain its activities, especially as it adds a Bitcoin treasury strategy that can be cash‑intensive and volatile.

Competitive Edge

Competitive Edge ZOOZ holds a narrow but distinctive niche: flywheel‑based power boosters for ultra‑fast EV charging in locations where the grid is too weak. Its technology gives it a differentiated position versus the many battery‑based solutions, with advantages in durability, safety, and environmental profile. Early partnerships (such as pilots with power authorities and mobility players) suggest real interest, but the company is still competing against far larger energy storage and EV‑infrastructure providers. The recent pivot toward becoming a Bitcoin treasury vehicle also changes how it is perceived: the story is now split between industrial technology and digital‑asset exposure, which may broaden its appeal to some investors but also blurs the pure‑play industrial positioning.

Innovation and R&D

Innovation and R&D On the technology side, ZOOZ is clearly innovation‑driven. Its kinetic flywheel system is unusual in the EV charging world and offers meaningful technical distinctions from batteries: long life, rapid response, temperature resilience, and less reliance on scarce materials. The company appears committed to continued R&D, both to refine the ZOOZTER platform and to explore additional uses such as defense or other high‑power applications. At the same time, management is innovating at the corporate strategy level through the Bitcoin treasury approach. That move introduces financial and regulatory complexity and could stretch management bandwidth, so the key question is whether the company can maintain focused engineering progress while also building out this new digital‑asset layer.

Summary

Overall, ZOOZ Strategy looks like a very early‑stage, high‑concept company with two distinct pillars: a specialized industrial technology for EV charging and a new identity as a Bitcoin treasury vehicle. Financially, it remains pre‑revenue with small but steady losses, a light and debt‑free balance sheet, and ongoing cash burn. Strategically, it has genuine innovation and a clear niche in flywheel‑based power solutions, supported by initial partnerships that validate the concept but do not yet translate into meaningful commercial scale. The Bitcoin strategy adds potential upside tied to digital‑asset markets but also brings volatility and raises questions about focus and synergy between the two businesses. The central uncertainties revolve around execution: can ZOOZ convert pilots into recurring, sizable revenue, manage its cash carefully, and clarify how its industrial and Bitcoin ambitions fit together over time?