ZVSA - ZyVersa Therapeutic... Stock Analysis | Stock Taper
Logo
ZyVersa Therapeutics, Inc.

ZVSA

ZyVersa Therapeutics, Inc. NASDAQ
$0.26 -1.14% (-0.00)

Market Cap $2.10 M
52w High $1.94
52w Low $0.11
P/E -0.08
Volume 8.20K
Outstanding Shares 8.10M

Income Statement

Period Revenue Operating Expense Net Income Net Profit Margin Earnings Per Share EBITDA
Q3-2025 $0 $20.75M $-19.81M 0% $-2.56 $-20.53M
Q2-2025 $0 $2.04M $-2.21M 0% $-0.46 $-2.08M
Q1-2025 $0 $2.14M $-2.26M 0% $-0.73 $-2.26M
Q4-2024 $26.08K $1.29M $-1.42M -5.45K% $-1.31 $-1.29M
Q3-2024 $0 $2.27M $-2.4M 0% $-2.43 $-2.27M

What's going well?

The company received a large boost from 'other' income this quarter, which helped reduce the impact of operating losses. R&D spending shows ZVSA is still investing in future products.

What's concerning?

There is still no revenue, losses are growing fast, and the company is spending heavily on overhead. The big jump in share count means existing shareholders are getting diluted.

Balance Statement

Period Cash & Short-term Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Equity
Q3-2025 $527.98K $1.04M $12.77M $-11.73M
Q2-2025 $72.09K $19.64M $13.54M $6.1M
Q1-2025 $1.61M $20.99M $12.86M $8.13M
Q4-2024 $1.53M $20.6M $12.08M $8.52M
Q3-2024 $122.92K $19.42M $12.4M $7.03M

What's financially strong about this company?

Cash increased this quarter, and there is no formal debt or lease obligations. Asset base is simple and has no risky intangibles.

What are the financial risks or weaknesses?

Liabilities are over 10 times assets, equity is deeply negative, and there is almost no cash relative to what is owed. The company is at risk of running out of money quickly.

Cash Flow Statement

Period Net Income Cash From Operations Cash From Investing Cash From Financing Net Change Free Cash Flow
Q3-2025 $-19.81B $-1.41B $0 $1.86B $455.89M $-1.41B
Q2-2025 $-2.21B $-1.52B $0 $-17.72M $-1.54B $-1.52B
Q1-2025 $-2.26M $-1.77B $0 $1.85B $80.61M $-1.77B
Q4-2024 $-1.42M $-1.22M $0 $2.63M $1.41M $-1.22M
Q3-2024 $-2.4M $-644.4K $0 $647.84K $3.44K $-3.08B

What's strong about this company's cash flow?

Cash burn is shrinking slightly, and the company was able to raise enough money to boost its cash balance this quarter. Most reported losses are non-cash accounting items, not actual cash outflows.

What are the cash flow concerns?

The business is still burning over $1.4 billion in cash per quarter and depends on outside investors to survive. Cash on hand only covers a few months of operations, and ongoing dilution hurts shareholders.

5-Year Trend Analysis

A comprehensive look at ZyVersa Therapeutics, Inc.'s financial evolution and strategic trajectory over the past five years.

+ Strengths

ZyVersa’s strengths center on its differentiated scientific platforms, focused on underlying disease mechanisms rather than symptom control, and an improved balance sheet profile with no traditional debt and positive equity compared with its earlier history. Its licensing relationships and intellectual property provide a foundation for potential first‑ or best‑in‑class therapies in kidney and inflammatory diseases. Management is clearly committed to advancing the pipeline, as shown by the substantial increase in R&D activity and well‑defined clinical plans.

! Risks

The dominant risks are financial and execution‑related. The company has no revenue, substantial and rising losses, and a history of burning cash with a limited runway, often needing frequent external capital raises. Clinical risk is also high: both major programs are still in early or mid‑stage development, and any disappointing data, delays, or regulatory issues could significantly impair their value. Competitive pressure from larger, better‑funded companies in kidney disease, cardiometabolic disorders, and inflammation further heightens the risk that ZyVersa’s assets may struggle to stand out or reach market.

Outlook

Looking ahead, ZyVersa’s trajectory hinges on three factors: generating convincing clinical data for VAR 200 and IC 100, securing sufficient funding or strategic partnerships to sustain operations, and navigating intense competition in its chosen indications. If its science translates into strong clinical outcomes and it can stabilize its finances, the company could unlock meaningful value from its platforms. If funding remains tight or clinical results disappoint, the combination of ongoing cash burn and lack of revenue leaves little margin for error. Overall, the story is one of high scientific potential balanced by very significant financial and operational uncertainty.