ALUB-UN
ALUB-UN
Alussa Energy Acquisition Corp.Income Statement
| Period | Revenue | Operating Expense | Net Income | Net Profit Margin | Earnings Per Share | EBITDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2025 | $0 | $8.83M ▲ | $-7.39M ▼ | 0% | $-0.21 ▼ | $-8.83M ▼ |
| Q3-2025 | $0 | $15.61K | $-15.61K | 0% | $0 | $-15.61K |
Balance Statement
| Period | Cash & Short-term | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Total Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2025 | $1.16M ▲ | $290.24M ▲ | $18.72M ▲ | $271.53M ▲ |
| Q3-2025 | $520 | $1.48M ▲ | $1.54M ▲ | $-66.79K ▼ |
| Q2-2025 | $520 | $704.16K | $755.35K | $-51.19K |
Cash Flow Statement
| Period | Net Income | Cash From Operations | Cash From Investing | Cash From Financing | Net Change | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2025 | $-7.39M | $-225.71K | $-287.5M | $288.89M | $1.16M | $-225.71K |
What's strong about this company's cash flow?
The company was able to raise a large amount of money by issuing new shares, giving it some cash to operate for now. Actual cash burn from operations is much smaller than the accounting loss.
What are the cash flow concerns?
The business is not generating cash and relies completely on outside funding, especially from selling new shares. Cash on hand is low, and without more funding, the company would run out of money quickly.
5-Year Trend Analysis
A comprehensive look at Alussa Energy Acquisition Corp.'s financial evolution and strategic trajectory over the past five years.
Financially, the legacy ALUB-UN vehicle shows a very conservative balance sheet with strong liquidity and almost no debt, which reduces near-term financial risk. Strategically, the merger has resulted in an operating company—FREYR Battery—with potential technological differentiation, a sustainability-focused brand, and exposure to sizable growth markets in batteries and U.S. solar and storage. Access to equity capital and government incentives adds further support.
On the SPAC side, the core risk was always that the shell has no revenue and burns cash until a successful merger. Post-merger, the main risks shift to FREYR’s execution: scaling a relatively novel manufacturing approach, delivering on cost and performance promises, ramping new U.S. solar assets, and competing against large incumbents. High capital intensity, policy dependence, and ongoing cash burn until profitability is reached heighten the uncertainty.
The near-term picture is dominated by transition: moving from a cash-rich but non-operating SPAC into a fully fledged clean energy business. The outlook depends far more on FREYR’s ability to turn its technology and U.S. solar pivot into stable revenues and positive cash flow than on ALUB-UN’s historical shell financials. If FREYR executes well, the combination of advanced technology and policy-supported markets could be favorable; if execution falters or market conditions shift, the lack of a diversified legacy business base may magnify downside volatility.
About Alussa Energy Acquisition Corp.
https://www.alussaenergy.comAlussa Energy Acquisition Corp. II focuses on effecting a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses. The company was incorporated in 2024 and is based in Austin, Texas.
Income Statement
| Period | Revenue | Operating Expense | Net Income | Net Profit Margin | Earnings Per Share | EBITDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2025 | $0 | $8.83M ▲ | $-7.39M ▼ | 0% | $-0.21 ▼ | $-8.83M ▼ |
| Q3-2025 | $0 | $15.61K | $-15.61K | 0% | $0 | $-15.61K |
Balance Statement
| Period | Cash & Short-term | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Total Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2025 | $1.16M ▲ | $290.24M ▲ | $18.72M ▲ | $271.53M ▲ |
| Q3-2025 | $520 | $1.48M ▲ | $1.54M ▲ | $-66.79K ▼ |
| Q2-2025 | $520 | $704.16K | $755.35K | $-51.19K |
Cash Flow Statement
| Period | Net Income | Cash From Operations | Cash From Investing | Cash From Financing | Net Change | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2025 | $-7.39M | $-225.71K | $-287.5M | $288.89M | $1.16M | $-225.71K |
What's strong about this company's cash flow?
The company was able to raise a large amount of money by issuing new shares, giving it some cash to operate for now. Actual cash burn from operations is much smaller than the accounting loss.
What are the cash flow concerns?
The business is not generating cash and relies completely on outside funding, especially from selling new shares. Cash on hand is low, and without more funding, the company would run out of money quickly.
5-Year Trend Analysis
A comprehensive look at Alussa Energy Acquisition Corp.'s financial evolution and strategic trajectory over the past five years.
Financially, the legacy ALUB-UN vehicle shows a very conservative balance sheet with strong liquidity and almost no debt, which reduces near-term financial risk. Strategically, the merger has resulted in an operating company—FREYR Battery—with potential technological differentiation, a sustainability-focused brand, and exposure to sizable growth markets in batteries and U.S. solar and storage. Access to equity capital and government incentives adds further support.
On the SPAC side, the core risk was always that the shell has no revenue and burns cash until a successful merger. Post-merger, the main risks shift to FREYR’s execution: scaling a relatively novel manufacturing approach, delivering on cost and performance promises, ramping new U.S. solar assets, and competing against large incumbents. High capital intensity, policy dependence, and ongoing cash burn until profitability is reached heighten the uncertainty.
The near-term picture is dominated by transition: moving from a cash-rich but non-operating SPAC into a fully fledged clean energy business. The outlook depends far more on FREYR’s ability to turn its technology and U.S. solar pivot into stable revenues and positive cash flow than on ALUB-UN’s historical shell financials. If FREYR executes well, the combination of advanced technology and policy-supported markets could be favorable; if execution falters or market conditions shift, the lack of a diversified legacy business base may magnify downside volatility.

CEO
Ole Henry Slorer
Compensation Summary
(Year )
Ratings Snapshot
Rating : C-

