Logo

SELF

Global Self Storage, Inc.

SELF

Global Self Storage, Inc. NASDAQ
$5.16 1.57% (+0.08)

Market Cap $58.50 M
52w High $5.89
52w Low $4.73
Dividend Yield 0.29%
P/E 32.25
Volume 7.87K
Outstanding Shares 11.34M

Income Statement

Period Revenue Operating Expense Net Income Net Profit Margin Earnings Per Share EBITDA
Q3-2025 $3.226M $1.258M $496.259K 15.385% $0.04 $1.115M
Q2-2025 $3.194M $1.186M $664.216K 20.793% $0.058 $1.286M
Q1-2025 $3.126M $1.194M $555.152K 17.757% $0.049 $1.186M
Q4-2024 $3.187M $1.209M $84.406K 2.649% $0.007 $698.385K
Q3-2024 $3.2M $1.173M $1.182M 36.924% $0.11 $1.85M

Balance Statement

Period Cash & Short-term Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Equity
Q3-2025 $7.457M $64.836M $17.902M $46.934M
Q2-2025 $7.513M $64.996M $17.807M $47.189M
Q1-2025 $7.222M $65.14M $17.865M $47.275M
Q4-2024 $7.181M $65.515M $18.077M $47.438M
Q3-2024 $6.762M $66.275M $18.214M $48.061M

Cash Flow Statement

Period Net Income Cash From Operations Cash From Investing Cash From Financing Net Change Free Cash Flow
Q3-2025 $496.259K $1.043M $-101.475K $-975.833K $-34.759K $941.074K
Q2-2025 $664.216K $1.342M $-61.456K $-970.831K $309.286K $1.387M
Q1-2025 $555.152K $1.07M $-45.639K $-964.263K $59.997K $1.024M
Q4-2024 $84.406K $1.262M $-15.896K $-962.691K $282.927K $1.246M
Q3-2024 $1.182M $1.024M $0 $-1.198M $-174.709K $1.024M

Revenue by Products

Product Q4-2024Q1-2025Q2-2025Q3-2025
Management Fees And Other Income
Management Fees And Other Income
$0 $0 $0 $0
Real Estate Other
Real Estate Other
$0 $0 $0 $0

Five-Year Company Overview

Income Statement

Income Statement Global Self Storage shows a pattern of steady, rental‑driven revenue rather than rapid growth. The top line has been fairly stable over the past several years, which is typical for a mature self‑storage REIT focused on occupancy and rent levels rather than big swings in sales. Profitability looks modest but consistently positive, with earnings per share moving around from year to year rather than rising in a straight line. That bumpiness suggests sensitivity to items like property-level expenses, corporate costs, and financing costs, but not a fundamental deterioration in the business. Overall, the income statement points to a slow‑and‑steady, income‑oriented model with limited growth momentum but reasonable earnings stability.


Balance Sheet

Balance Sheet The balance sheet appears relatively simple and steady. Total assets and shareholders’ equity have inched up over time, indicating measured growth rather than aggressive expansion. Debt is present but not overwhelming relative to the size of the asset base, which is important for a REIT that depends on financing to acquire and operate properties. Cash on hand is modest but has improved from earlier years, giving the company a little more flexibility than before. Overall, the balance sheet looks conservative for a small REIT: some leverage, but not a highly stretched structure, with asset values and equity growing gradually.


Cash Flow

Cash Flow The cash flow data provided are very limited and appear to be rounded, so it is hard to draw detailed conclusions. As a self‑storage REIT, the company’s underlying model should generate relatively predictable cash coming in from monthly rents, with ongoing needs for property maintenance and occasional capital spending for improvements or acquisitions. The key questions—how much cash is left after these needs, how much is paid out as dividends, and how much is reinvested—are not visible in this summary. Based on the stable revenue and balance sheet, it is reasonable to infer that cash generation is steady rather than spectacular, but the lack of detailed figures means any view of cash flow quality carries a fair amount of uncertainty.


Competitive Edge

Competitive Edge Global Self Storage operates in a very competitive but highly fragmented industry. Its edge comes less from sheer scale and more from where and how it competes. The company focuses on secondary and smaller markets where land and acquisition costs are lower and where there is often less direct pressure from the largest national REITs. It emphasizes high occupancy, long‑staying tenants, and strong customer service, supported by secure facilities and convenient online tools. The shift to self‑managing its properties strengthens control over pricing, marketing, and service standards. On the other hand, its relatively small size means less brand recognition and fewer financial resources than the biggest players, leaving it more exposed to local competition, economic slowdowns in particular regions, and changes in interest rates.


Innovation and R&D

Innovation and R&D This is not a heavy R&D or “deep tech” company, but it does use practical innovation to sharpen its operations. The most notable area is its proprietary revenue management program, which continuously monitors local competitors’ pricing and adjusts rents to keep occupancy high while protecting yield. The company has invested in a solid online presence, including digital rentals, payments, and in some locations self‑serve kiosks, which helps capture demand from customers who prefer quick, contactless service. Security systems—surveillance, controlled access, and fenced sites—are modern and consistently marketed as a core part of the value proposition. Looking ahead, the big opportunities are likely in incremental steps: more data analytics and possibly AI to refine pricing and marketing, potential adoption of “smart” unit features, and selective sustainability upgrades. Innovation here is about small, cumulative improvements rather than breakthrough technology.


Summary

Global Self Storage comes across as a small, focused self‑storage REIT built on discipline rather than flash. Its income statement tells a story of stable rental revenue and modest, sometimes uneven, but positive earnings. The balance sheet is straightforward, with a manageable level of debt and gradually rising asset and equity values, reflecting careful, incremental growth. While detailed cash flow data are thin, the business model suggests steady, recurring cash tied to occupancy and rent levels. Strategically, the company leans on operational excellence: good locations in less crowded markets, strong emphasis on security and customer service, and a data‑driven approach to pricing. It also offers a management platform to third‑party owners, which could extend its brand and know‑how beyond its owned portfolio. The main strengths are stability, disciplined management, and focused use of technology; the main risks are small scale, exposure to local market conditions, and dependence on the broader financing environment. Overall, SELF looks more like a conservative, income‑oriented platform than a high‑growth story, with progress driven by careful acquisitions and continuous operational fine‑tuning rather than big, transformative bets.