BSIN - Big Sky Industrial... Stock Analysis | Stock Taper
Logo
Big Sky Industrial Inc.

BSIN

Big Sky Industrial Inc. NASDAQ
$1.25 5.04% (+0.06)

Market Cap $66.45 M
52w High $1.52
52w Low $0.66
P/E -15.62
Volume 2.45M
Outstanding Shares 52.32M

Income Statement

Period Revenue Operating Expense Net Income Net Profit Margin Earnings Per Share EBITDA
Q1-2026 $1.6M $3.15M $-3.19M -198.57% $-0.08 $-2.52M
Q4-2025 $1.39M $1.37M $-1.86M -133.72% $-0.05 $-1.22M
Q3-2025 $1.74M $2.24M $-3.34M -192.23% $-0.1 $-2.41M
Q2-2025 $2.03M $2.25M $-6.06M -298.72% $-0.19 $-4.85M

What's going well?

Revenue is growing at a healthy pace, and gross profit turned positive for the first time. The company avoided any big one-time charges, so results are straightforward.

What's concerning?

Operating expenses soared, leading to much bigger losses. The company is losing nearly $2 for every $1 in sales, and share dilution is hurting existing shareholders.

Balance Statement

Period Cash & Short-term Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Equity
Q1-2026 $10.62M $55.19M $16.72M $38.48M
Q4-2025 $575K $40.63M $16.43M $24.2M
Q3-2025 $1.73M $46.5M $21.46M $25.04M
Q2-2025 $6.94M $50.99M $23.03M $27.96M

What's financially strong about this company?

They have a large cash cushion, almost no debt, and own most of their assets outright. Their assets are high quality and mostly tangible, with no risky goodwill or intangibles.

What are the financial risks or weaknesses?

The company has a long history of losses, as shown by negative retained earnings, and is likely relying on new share sales for cash. Receivables are rising faster than payables, which could mean slower customer payments.

Cash Flow Statement

Period Net Income Cash From Operations Cash From Investing Cash From Financing Net Change Free Cash Flow
Q1-2026 $-3.19M $-2.45M $-4.43M $16.91M $10.02M $-6.88M
Q4-2025 $-1.86M $-857K $-2.21M $2.08M $-986K $-3.13M
Q3-2025 $-3.34M $-155K $-5.16M $0 $-5.31M $-5.3M
Q2-2025 $-6.06M $-1.58M $-2.09M $-104K $-3.77M $-3.81M

What's strong about this company's cash flow?

The company was able to raise a large amount of cash by issuing new shares, giving it some breathing room for now. Cash on hand is much higher than last quarter.

What are the cash flow concerns?

Cash burn from operations and investments is rising sharply, and the business is highly dependent on outside funding. Shareholders are being heavily diluted, and the current cash balance will only last a short time at this pace.

5-Year Trend Analysis

A comprehensive look at Big Sky Industrial Inc.'s financial evolution and strategic trajectory over the past five years.

+ Strengths

BSIN combines a relatively clean balance sheet—with low leverage and decent liquidity—with a distinctive geological asset and integrated business model in helium, carbon management, and oil recovery. The company has secured an offtake agreement with a strong industrial gas partner, which, if operations begin as planned, could anchor future revenue. The strategy aims to turn a single, CO2‑rich gas stream into multiple income sources, which could provide diversification and cost advantages over time.

! Risks

The main risks are financial and execution related. Current operations are loss‑making, cash burn is substantial, and free cash flow is deeply negative. The entire thesis depends on delivering a complex, capital‑intensive project on time and on budget, obtaining and keeping key regulatory approvals for carbon sequestration, and ensuring that commodity prices and tax credit regimes remain supportive. As a small, pre‑scale company, BSIN has less buffer against delays, technical setbacks, or changes in policy than larger, diversified peers.

Outlook

The outlook is highly binary and uncertain. On one hand, successful completion and ramp‑up of the Big Sky Carbon Hub could transform BSIN from a struggling oil and gas producer into a niche industrial gas and carbon solutions platform with multiple revenue streams and an attractive strategic position. On the other hand, continued losses, funding challenges, regulatory hurdles, or project execution issues could strain the balance sheet and limit the company’s ability to realize that potential. Future results will depend far more on project delivery and policy stability than on current historical financials, which today mainly show the cost of the transition rather than its benefits.