CILGX
CILGX
CLARKSTON FUND, INSTITUTIONAL CLASSIncome Statement
| Period | Revenue | Operating Expense | Net Income | Net Profit Margin | Earnings Per Share | EBITDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2-2023 | $2.49M | $2.34M | $149.43K | 6.01% | $0.01 | $-2.08M |
| Q1-2023 | $2.49M ▲ | $2.34M ▼ | $149.43K ▲ | 6.01% ▲ | $0.01 ▲ | $-2.08M ▲ |
| Q4-2022 | $2.44M | $2.5M | $-55.33K | -2.26% | $-0 | $-2.25M |
| Q3-2022 | $2.44M ▲ | $2.5M ▼ | $-55.33K ▲ | -2.26% ▲ | $-0 ▲ | $-2.25M ▲ |
| Q2-2022 | $2.23M | $13.22M | $-11M | -493.43% | $-0.96 | $-12.88M |
What's going well?
Revenue and profit are steady, with no signs of decline. The company is highly profitable at the operating level, and there is no debt or interest burden.
What's concerning?
Earnings are heavily distorted by a big negative 'other' expense, which makes the quality of profits questionable. There's no growth, and the lack of detail on costs and business activity makes it hard to judge the company's true health.
Balance Statement
| Period | Cash & Short-term | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Total Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2-2023 | $32.26K | $181.56M | $327.73K | $181.22M |
| Q1-2023 | $32.26K ▼ | $181.56M ▼ | $327.73K ▼ | $181.22M ▼ |
| Q4-2022 | $78.75K | $190.38M | $5.14M | $185.22M |
| Q3-2022 | $78.75K ▼ | $190.38M ▼ | $5.14M ▲ | $185.22M ▼ |
| Q2-2022 | $676.39K | $190.79M | $667.32K | $190.09M |
What's financially strong about this company?
The company has no debt at all, a huge equity cushion, and very few liabilities. Its assets are high quality, with no risky goodwill or intangibles, and it can easily pay its bills.
What are the financial risks or weaknesses?
Retained earnings are negative, which means the company has lost money over its history. Also, almost all assets are in investments, so if those investments lose value, the balance sheet could weaken.
Cash Flow Statement
| Period | Net Income | Cash From Operations | Cash From Investing | Cash From Financing | Net Change | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2-2023 | $149.43K | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Q1-2023 | $149.43K ▲ | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Q4-2022 | $-55.33K | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Q3-2022 | $-55.33K ▲ | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Q2-2022 | $-11M | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
5-Year Trend Analysis
A comprehensive look at CLARKSTON FUND, INSTITUTIONAL CLASS's financial evolution and strategic trajectory over the past five years.
Key positives include a profitable and efficient core advisory operation, a very conservative balance sheet with no debt, and a strong equity base supported by a sizable investment portfolio. The fund’s clearly defined "Quality Value" philosophy and concentrated, research‑heavy approach provide a distinct identity in a crowded market, and the recent move to a modern investment management platform should enhance operational resilience and free capacity for deeper analysis. Together, these factors point to a business that is structurally sound at the operating level and intentionally focused in its investment style.
Major risks center on the disconnect between solid operating income and very weak net earnings, driven by large non‑operating losses and a history of accumulated deficits. This raises questions about the volatility and drivers of those non‑operating items, and whether they are temporary or structural features of the fund’s strategy and accounting. Additional concerns include exposure to market and style cycles that can challenge value‑oriented portfolios, ongoing fee and performance pressure from passive and low‑cost competitors, and the limited visibility into true cash‑generation trends given the flat cash‑flow statement.
Looking ahead, the fund’s prospects hinge on its ability to translate a strong operating model and upgraded technology platform into more stable, favorable overall financial outcomes. If non‑operating headwinds moderate and the "Quality Value" strategy gains or maintains traction with clients, the existing fee base and lean cost structure provide a solid foundation for healthier reported results. At the same time, the environment for active asset managers remains challenging, and with only a single year of detailed financial data, there is meaningful uncertainty about how sustainable or repeatable current patterns in earnings and cash behavior will be over the longer term.
About CLARKSTON FUND, INSTITUTIONAL CLASS
https://www.copleyfund.comUnder normal circumstances, the fund invests primarily in U.S.-traded equity securities of large-capitalization companies. The fund's investments in equity securities may include common stock, preferred stock and convertible securities. It may also invest in foreign equity securities through American Depositary Receipts ("ADRs").
Income Statement
| Period | Revenue | Operating Expense | Net Income | Net Profit Margin | Earnings Per Share | EBITDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2-2023 | $2.49M | $2.34M | $149.43K | 6.01% | $0.01 | $-2.08M |
| Q1-2023 | $2.49M ▲ | $2.34M ▼ | $149.43K ▲ | 6.01% ▲ | $0.01 ▲ | $-2.08M ▲ |
| Q4-2022 | $2.44M | $2.5M | $-55.33K | -2.26% | $-0 | $-2.25M |
| Q3-2022 | $2.44M ▲ | $2.5M ▼ | $-55.33K ▲ | -2.26% ▲ | $-0 ▲ | $-2.25M ▲ |
| Q2-2022 | $2.23M | $13.22M | $-11M | -493.43% | $-0.96 | $-12.88M |
What's going well?
Revenue and profit are steady, with no signs of decline. The company is highly profitable at the operating level, and there is no debt or interest burden.
What's concerning?
Earnings are heavily distorted by a big negative 'other' expense, which makes the quality of profits questionable. There's no growth, and the lack of detail on costs and business activity makes it hard to judge the company's true health.
Balance Statement
| Period | Cash & Short-term | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Total Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2-2023 | $32.26K | $181.56M | $327.73K | $181.22M |
| Q1-2023 | $32.26K ▼ | $181.56M ▼ | $327.73K ▼ | $181.22M ▼ |
| Q4-2022 | $78.75K | $190.38M | $5.14M | $185.22M |
| Q3-2022 | $78.75K ▼ | $190.38M ▼ | $5.14M ▲ | $185.22M ▼ |
| Q2-2022 | $676.39K | $190.79M | $667.32K | $190.09M |
What's financially strong about this company?
The company has no debt at all, a huge equity cushion, and very few liabilities. Its assets are high quality, with no risky goodwill or intangibles, and it can easily pay its bills.
What are the financial risks or weaknesses?
Retained earnings are negative, which means the company has lost money over its history. Also, almost all assets are in investments, so if those investments lose value, the balance sheet could weaken.
Cash Flow Statement
| Period | Net Income | Cash From Operations | Cash From Investing | Cash From Financing | Net Change | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2-2023 | $149.43K | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Q1-2023 | $149.43K ▲ | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Q4-2022 | $-55.33K | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Q3-2022 | $-55.33K ▲ | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Q2-2022 | $-11M | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
5-Year Trend Analysis
A comprehensive look at CLARKSTON FUND, INSTITUTIONAL CLASS's financial evolution and strategic trajectory over the past five years.
Key positives include a profitable and efficient core advisory operation, a very conservative balance sheet with no debt, and a strong equity base supported by a sizable investment portfolio. The fund’s clearly defined "Quality Value" philosophy and concentrated, research‑heavy approach provide a distinct identity in a crowded market, and the recent move to a modern investment management platform should enhance operational resilience and free capacity for deeper analysis. Together, these factors point to a business that is structurally sound at the operating level and intentionally focused in its investment style.
Major risks center on the disconnect between solid operating income and very weak net earnings, driven by large non‑operating losses and a history of accumulated deficits. This raises questions about the volatility and drivers of those non‑operating items, and whether they are temporary or structural features of the fund’s strategy and accounting. Additional concerns include exposure to market and style cycles that can challenge value‑oriented portfolios, ongoing fee and performance pressure from passive and low‑cost competitors, and the limited visibility into true cash‑generation trends given the flat cash‑flow statement.
Looking ahead, the fund’s prospects hinge on its ability to translate a strong operating model and upgraded technology platform into more stable, favorable overall financial outcomes. If non‑operating headwinds moderate and the "Quality Value" strategy gains or maintains traction with clients, the existing fee base and lean cost structure provide a solid foundation for healthier reported results. At the same time, the environment for active asset managers remains challenging, and with only a single year of detailed financial data, there is meaningful uncertainty about how sustainable or repeatable current patterns in earnings and cash behavior will be over the longer term.

CEO
Irving E. Levine

