LIME
LIME
Neutron Holdings, Inc.Income Statement
| Period | Revenue | Operating Expense | Net Income | Net Profit Margin | Earnings Per Share | EBITDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3-2016 | $25.72M ▲ | $9.06M ▼ | $1.06M ▲ | 4.14% ▲ | $0.07 ▲ | $435K ▲ |
| Q2-2016 | $21.01M ▼ | $10.54M ▲ | $-3.37M ▲ | -16.05% ▲ | $-0.35 ▲ | $-1.64M ▲ |
| Q1-2016 | $23.15M ▼ | $10.33M ▼ | $-7.33M ▼ | -31.66% ▼ | $-0.76 ▼ | $-5.73M ▼ |
| Q4-2015 | $30.21M ▼ | $10.79M ▲ | $-1.52M ▼ | -5.02% ▼ | $-0.16 ▼ | $-473K ▼ |
| Q3-2015 | $32.16M | $9.64M | $1.81M | 5.64% | $0.15 | $2.71M |
What's going well?
Revenue jumped 22% and gross profit rose even faster, showing strong demand and better cost control. The company cut operating expenses and swung to a profit after a big loss last quarter.
What's concerning?
The business is still low margin, and profits rely partly on non-operating income. High interest costs could become a problem if growth slows.
Balance Statement
| Period | Cash & Short-term | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Total Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3-2016 | $879K ▼ | $49.73M ▲ | $54.66M ▲ | $-4.93M ▲ |
| Q2-2016 | $2.74M ▲ | $46.21M ▼ | $51.98M ▲ | $-5.77M ▼ |
| Q1-2016 | $2.37M ▼ | $47.55M ▼ | $49.82M ▼ | $-2.27M ▼ |
| Q4-2015 | $5.39M ▼ | $57.57M ▼ | $52.47M ▼ | $5.1M ▼ |
| Q3-2015 | $6.76M | $59.85M | $52.88M | $6.98M |
What's financially strong about this company?
Receivables are high and inventory is not piling up. The company has some customers prepaying for services, which helps with cash flow.
What are the financial risks or weaknesses?
Cash is running out fast, debt is rising, and the company owes more than it owns. Negative retained earnings show a long history of losses, and liquidity is getting tighter.
Cash Flow Statement
| Period | Net Income | Cash From Operations | Cash From Investing | Cash From Financing | Net Change | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3-2016 | $1.06M ▲ | $-1.4M ▼ | $-340K ▲ | $-115K ▼ | $-1.86M ▼ | $-1.74M ▼ |
| Q2-2016 | $-3.41M ▲ | $719K ▲ | $-359K ▲ | $4K ▼ | $364K ▲ | $360K ▲ |
| Q1-2016 | $-7.34M ▼ | $-2.51M ▼ | $-546K ▲ | $40K ▲ | $-3.02M ▼ | $-3.06M ▼ |
| Q4-2015 | $-1.88M ▼ | $-281K ▼ | $-1.08M ▼ | $-4K ▲ | $-1.37M ▼ | $-1.36M ▼ |
| Q3-2015 | $1.81M | $1.49M | $-489K | $-147K | $854K | $1M |
What's strong about this company's cash flow?
Net income improved dramatically, swinging to a profit from a big loss last quarter. Capital spending is moderate, so future cash needs for equipment are not excessive.
What are the cash flow concerns?
Operating cash flow and free cash flow both turned sharply negative, and the company is burning through cash fast. Receivables jumped, meaning customers are paying slower, and the cash balance is now dangerously low.
5-Year Trend Analysis
A comprehensive look at Neutron Holdings, Inc.'s financial evolution and strategic trajectory over the past five years.
Key positives include a solid revenue base for a niche energy‑efficiency provider, acceptable gross margins that suggest projects are priced and executed reasonably well, and positive operating cash flow despite accounting losses. Liquidity is adequate, with current assets covering short‑term obligations, and the company appears able to access debt financing to support its investment and acquisition activities. Operationally, relationships with utilities and a service model focused on transparency and validated savings provide a credible platform within an industry that benefits from long‑term trends toward efficiency and decarbonization.
On the risk side, the company has not yet converted its revenue base into consistent profitability, with net losses, negative EBITDA, and a heavy overhead burden relative to sales. The balance sheet shows a very thin equity cushion and a long history of accumulated losses, increasing financial fragility. Leverage is meaningful relative to equity, and free cash flow is slightly negative, implying ongoing reliance on external financing if investment levels are maintained. Competitive intensity, potential commoditization of services, and exposure to policy and regulatory changes in utility efficiency programs add further uncertainty. Limited visible investment in proprietary R&D or technology may also constrain long‑term differentiation.
The overall outlook appears balanced but cautious. Lime Energy operates in a structurally favorable thematic area—energy efficiency and grid‑side demand reduction—but must demonstrate that it can scale profitably, streamline its cost structure, and strengthen its balance sheet. If the company can grow revenue without proportionally increasing overhead, improve contract economics, and gradually reduce dependence on debt, its position could improve materially. Conversely, if margins remain thin, contract competition intensifies, or financing becomes more difficult or expensive, the current combination of persistent losses and a leveraged, equity‑light balance sheet could become more challenging over time.
About Neutron Holdings, Inc.
https://www.li.meNeutron Holdings, Inc., doing business as Lime, provides shared electric vehicle services, offering e-bikes and e-scooters for short-term rentals. As a leading global micromobility business, Lime partners with cities to provide these transportation options, having powered over 1 billion rides across five continents.
Income Statement
| Period | Revenue | Operating Expense | Net Income | Net Profit Margin | Earnings Per Share | EBITDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3-2016 | $25.72M ▲ | $9.06M ▼ | $1.06M ▲ | 4.14% ▲ | $0.07 ▲ | $435K ▲ |
| Q2-2016 | $21.01M ▼ | $10.54M ▲ | $-3.37M ▲ | -16.05% ▲ | $-0.35 ▲ | $-1.64M ▲ |
| Q1-2016 | $23.15M ▼ | $10.33M ▼ | $-7.33M ▼ | -31.66% ▼ | $-0.76 ▼ | $-5.73M ▼ |
| Q4-2015 | $30.21M ▼ | $10.79M ▲ | $-1.52M ▼ | -5.02% ▼ | $-0.16 ▼ | $-473K ▼ |
| Q3-2015 | $32.16M | $9.64M | $1.81M | 5.64% | $0.15 | $2.71M |
What's going well?
Revenue jumped 22% and gross profit rose even faster, showing strong demand and better cost control. The company cut operating expenses and swung to a profit after a big loss last quarter.
What's concerning?
The business is still low margin, and profits rely partly on non-operating income. High interest costs could become a problem if growth slows.
Balance Statement
| Period | Cash & Short-term | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Total Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3-2016 | $879K ▼ | $49.73M ▲ | $54.66M ▲ | $-4.93M ▲ |
| Q2-2016 | $2.74M ▲ | $46.21M ▼ | $51.98M ▲ | $-5.77M ▼ |
| Q1-2016 | $2.37M ▼ | $47.55M ▼ | $49.82M ▼ | $-2.27M ▼ |
| Q4-2015 | $5.39M ▼ | $57.57M ▼ | $52.47M ▼ | $5.1M ▼ |
| Q3-2015 | $6.76M | $59.85M | $52.88M | $6.98M |
What's financially strong about this company?
Receivables are high and inventory is not piling up. The company has some customers prepaying for services, which helps with cash flow.
What are the financial risks or weaknesses?
Cash is running out fast, debt is rising, and the company owes more than it owns. Negative retained earnings show a long history of losses, and liquidity is getting tighter.
Cash Flow Statement
| Period | Net Income | Cash From Operations | Cash From Investing | Cash From Financing | Net Change | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3-2016 | $1.06M ▲ | $-1.4M ▼ | $-340K ▲ | $-115K ▼ | $-1.86M ▼ | $-1.74M ▼ |
| Q2-2016 | $-3.41M ▲ | $719K ▲ | $-359K ▲ | $4K ▼ | $364K ▲ | $360K ▲ |
| Q1-2016 | $-7.34M ▼ | $-2.51M ▼ | $-546K ▲ | $40K ▲ | $-3.02M ▼ | $-3.06M ▼ |
| Q4-2015 | $-1.88M ▼ | $-281K ▼ | $-1.08M ▼ | $-4K ▲ | $-1.37M ▼ | $-1.36M ▼ |
| Q3-2015 | $1.81M | $1.49M | $-489K | $-147K | $854K | $1M |
What's strong about this company's cash flow?
Net income improved dramatically, swinging to a profit from a big loss last quarter. Capital spending is moderate, so future cash needs for equipment are not excessive.
What are the cash flow concerns?
Operating cash flow and free cash flow both turned sharply negative, and the company is burning through cash fast. Receivables jumped, meaning customers are paying slower, and the cash balance is now dangerously low.
5-Year Trend Analysis
A comprehensive look at Neutron Holdings, Inc.'s financial evolution and strategic trajectory over the past five years.
Key positives include a solid revenue base for a niche energy‑efficiency provider, acceptable gross margins that suggest projects are priced and executed reasonably well, and positive operating cash flow despite accounting losses. Liquidity is adequate, with current assets covering short‑term obligations, and the company appears able to access debt financing to support its investment and acquisition activities. Operationally, relationships with utilities and a service model focused on transparency and validated savings provide a credible platform within an industry that benefits from long‑term trends toward efficiency and decarbonization.
On the risk side, the company has not yet converted its revenue base into consistent profitability, with net losses, negative EBITDA, and a heavy overhead burden relative to sales. The balance sheet shows a very thin equity cushion and a long history of accumulated losses, increasing financial fragility. Leverage is meaningful relative to equity, and free cash flow is slightly negative, implying ongoing reliance on external financing if investment levels are maintained. Competitive intensity, potential commoditization of services, and exposure to policy and regulatory changes in utility efficiency programs add further uncertainty. Limited visible investment in proprietary R&D or technology may also constrain long‑term differentiation.
The overall outlook appears balanced but cautious. Lime Energy operates in a structurally favorable thematic area—energy efficiency and grid‑side demand reduction—but must demonstrate that it can scale profitably, streamline its cost structure, and strengthen its balance sheet. If the company can grow revenue without proportionally increasing overhead, improve contract economics, and gradually reduce dependence on debt, its position could improve materially. Conversely, if margins remain thin, contract competition intensifies, or financing becomes more difficult or expensive, the current combination of persistent losses and a leveraged, equity‑light balance sheet could become more challenging over time.

CEO
Wayne Ting
Compensation Summary
(Year 2015)
Split Record
| Date | Type | Ratio |
|---|---|---|
| 2013-10-11 | Reverse | 1:7 |
| 2008-01-28 | Reverse | 1:7 |
ETFs Holding This Stock
Summary
Showing Top 1 of 1

