SLBT
SLBT
SL Science Holding LtdIncome Statement
| Period | Revenue | Operating Expense | Net Income | Net Profit Margin | Earnings Per Share | EBITDA |
|---|
Balance Statement
| Period | Cash & Short-term | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Total Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2025 | $1.26M ▼ | $2.82M ▼ | $533.28K ▼ | $2.28M ▼ |
| Q2-2025 | $3.37M ▼ | $5.79M ▼ | $1.06M ▲ | $4.73M ▼ |
| Q4-2024 | $3.68M | $5.93M | $204.9K | $5.73M |
Cash Flow Statement
| Period | Net Income | Cash From Operations | Cash From Investing | Cash From Financing | Net Change | Free Cash Flow |
|---|
5-Year Trend Analysis
A comprehensive look at SL Science Holding Ltd's financial evolution and strategic trajectory over the past five years.
SLBT combines a strong scientific focus with a relatively conservative financial structure. It holds more cash than debt, keeps leverage low, and maintains ample short-term liquidity, providing a buffer to support ongoing development. The company has a differentiated dual-platform strategy in off-the-shelf gamma delta T-cell therapies and exosome-based products, with the latter already generating some revenue and proving out aspects of its technology. Positive gross margins on existing sales and substantial investment in R&D indicate that the company is both capable of commercial execution on a small scale and committed to building long-term intellectual property.
At the same time, risks are significant. The company is loss-making with substantial negative operating and free cash flow, and a large accumulated deficit underscores the persistence of those losses. Its therapeutic programs are still at pre-clinical or very early development stages, where the probability of failure is high and timelines are long. Competition in both oncology and beauty products is intense, and better-funded rivals could outpace SLBT in clinical development, manufacturing, or marketing. Finally, the business model depends on continued access to external capital and successful execution of complex manufacturing and regulatory strategies, any of which could be disrupted by adverse data, market conditions, or operational setbacks.
Looking ahead, SLBT appears set for a period characterized by continued investment, scientific milestones, and financial volatility rather than stable profitability. Over the near to medium term, it is reasonable to expect ongoing losses and cash burn as the company pushes its cell therapy candidates toward clinical trials and expands its exosome product footprint. The long-term outlook is highly uncertain but potentially meaningful: if the off-the-shelf gamma delta platform and exosome technologies achieve clinical validation and scalable manufacturing, SLBT could carve out a differentiated position in both therapeutics and regenerative consumer products. Until there is clearer evidence from trials, partnerships, or sustained revenue growth, however, the company should be viewed as an early-stage, high-risk, innovation-driven enterprise.
About SL Science Holding Ltd
https://www.horizonacquisitionii.comHorizon Space Acquisition II Corp. aims to achieve strategic business combinations with other companies. This objective can be fulfilled through various transactional structures, including mergers, exchanges of shares, acquisitions of assets, direct purchases of stock, recapitalizations, or other forms of corporate reorganization.
Income Statement
| Period | Revenue | Operating Expense | Net Income | Net Profit Margin | Earnings Per Share | EBITDA |
|---|
Balance Statement
| Period | Cash & Short-term | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Total Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4-2025 | $1.26M ▼ | $2.82M ▼ | $533.28K ▼ | $2.28M ▼ |
| Q2-2025 | $3.37M ▼ | $5.79M ▼ | $1.06M ▲ | $4.73M ▼ |
| Q4-2024 | $3.68M | $5.93M | $204.9K | $5.73M |
Cash Flow Statement
| Period | Net Income | Cash From Operations | Cash From Investing | Cash From Financing | Net Change | Free Cash Flow |
|---|
5-Year Trend Analysis
A comprehensive look at SL Science Holding Ltd's financial evolution and strategic trajectory over the past five years.
SLBT combines a strong scientific focus with a relatively conservative financial structure. It holds more cash than debt, keeps leverage low, and maintains ample short-term liquidity, providing a buffer to support ongoing development. The company has a differentiated dual-platform strategy in off-the-shelf gamma delta T-cell therapies and exosome-based products, with the latter already generating some revenue and proving out aspects of its technology. Positive gross margins on existing sales and substantial investment in R&D indicate that the company is both capable of commercial execution on a small scale and committed to building long-term intellectual property.
At the same time, risks are significant. The company is loss-making with substantial negative operating and free cash flow, and a large accumulated deficit underscores the persistence of those losses. Its therapeutic programs are still at pre-clinical or very early development stages, where the probability of failure is high and timelines are long. Competition in both oncology and beauty products is intense, and better-funded rivals could outpace SLBT in clinical development, manufacturing, or marketing. Finally, the business model depends on continued access to external capital and successful execution of complex manufacturing and regulatory strategies, any of which could be disrupted by adverse data, market conditions, or operational setbacks.
Looking ahead, SLBT appears set for a period characterized by continued investment, scientific milestones, and financial volatility rather than stable profitability. Over the near to medium term, it is reasonable to expect ongoing losses and cash burn as the company pushes its cell therapy candidates toward clinical trials and expands its exosome product footprint. The long-term outlook is highly uncertain but potentially meaningful: if the off-the-shelf gamma delta platform and exosome technologies achieve clinical validation and scalable manufacturing, SLBT could carve out a differentiated position in both therapeutics and regenerative consumer products. Until there is clearer evidence from trials, partnerships, or sustained revenue growth, however, the company should be viewed as an early-stage, high-risk, innovation-driven enterprise.

CEO
Mingyu Li
Compensation Summary
(Year )
Ratings Snapshot
Rating : C-

